User talk:Vincebethel

License tagging for Image:Vincesecretservice.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vincesecretservice.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 19:13, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Francisco Tevez 19:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 19:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Guidelines
Please note the guidelines for editing at Autobiography and Conflict of interest. Charles Matthews 09:52, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Vince has continued to edit his page as a method of self-promotion; see his claim as being the "leading civilian authority" on a topic. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 01:02, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

All the references check out. THE ORIGINAL article was a snub (or snippet, I guess), written by SOMEONE ELSE back in approx. 1998-1999. ALL THE REFERENCES CHECK OUT---VINCE PALAMARA was on the History Channel as a Secret Service expert (aired 4 times), he is noted in over 45 other author's books for his research (almost always unsolicited), etc. etc. etc. Vincent Bugliosi calls Vince Palamara a Secret Service expert in his book "Four Days In November" as one of several prominent examples. Alleged self-promotion or not, the FACTS ARE THE FACTS. This page has been up, inviolate, for almost 2 years in its full state...the only time it really needed edited was when person (s) unknown would make silly, incorrect "additions"Vincebethel (talk) 16:31, 16 August 2008 (UTC) aLSO: THE CLAIM IS CORRECT: there are no other prominent Secret Service experts but myself. I am also noted in an OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT REPORT (THE ASSASSINATION RECORDS REVIEW BOARD FINAL REPORT, GIVEN TO PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON, TRENT LOTT, NEWT GINGRICH, ETC.), in Prof. Philip Melanson's SECRET SERVICE expose; my materials are stored under Deed Of Gift in the National Archives, at the JFK Library, etc. Someone needs to actually READ the FACTUAL content of references rather than turning this into a jealousy "debate": the facts are the facts; everything written is true...the entry is very popular in search engines/ very helpful and the integrity is 100%Vincebethel (talk) 16:36, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Vince Palamara
An article that you have been involved in editing, Vince Palamara, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Vince Palamara. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:29, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Vincebethel for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You have been blocked two weeks for this and the socks indef. Don't sock again. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 23:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia&. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. ~DC Let's Vent 22:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Vincebethel (talk) 23:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Dear sir: can you please accept my submission? It is very well sourced and the former agent is very noteable (as much or more so than the 20+ former agents already listed on Wikipedia). For one, he has a major book, with an accompanying media blitz, coming this Fall (11/2/10) from arguably the biggest publisher in the world, as well as a major 2 hour Discovery Channel documentary/ dvd. Thanks :O) Vincebethel (talk) 23:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Gerald Blaine
Hello, you seem to be adding self-promotional conspiracy material to the Gerald Blaine article, a BLP. Please stop adding this, as it is not notable and violates WP:BLP and WP:V. Johnnyt471 (talk) 04:20, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Gerald Blaine for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Gerald Blaine, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gerald Blaine until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FT2 (Talk 05:27, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Article Deletion: Vince Palamara
I've deleted the article Vince Palamara because it is a recreation of an article deleted via a deletion discussion. If you wish to overturn the results of that discussion, please submit the article to Deletion review. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 21:06, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

February 2012
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Mimi Alford. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rostz (talk) 17:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Roy Kellerman. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. 2 lines of K 303  12:08, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert DeProspero


The article Robert DeProspero has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 00:54, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Robert DeProspero for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert DeProspero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Robert DeProspero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 22:19, 13 September 2015 (UTC)