User talk:Vincecan

Hey, FGW
Self=promotion and ignorance are not virtues, though they apparently provide you some incentive in making distorted and totally erroneous claims. The public record you cite is filled with your own misconceptions and shows how zealots like you try to frame history. Vince

No
"Self=promotion" I am not FJ Gil-White "and ignorance are not virtues" I never claimed they were "though they apparently provide you some incentive in making distorted and totally erroneous claims" The question of how self-promotiong or ignorance would provide any incentive for me to make a distorted claim aside, if you do look at the article FGW wrote about you you'll notice that every claim made in it is backed up by at least one carefully footnoted piece of documentation that you can verify. "The public record you cite is filled with your own misconceptions" Since every claim is footnted, any misconception is that of the creator of the source document and thus not Gil-White's own. If he has used a source document that is factually incorrect, then he is always open to retract whatever claim relies on that source. "and shows how zealots like you try to frame history." If by zealot you mean someone dedicated to creating hypothesis about history and current events that explain the most data, then by all means Gil-White is guilty of doing so in his framing of history."

I encourage you to read the article about yourself at http://www.hirhome.com/israel/mprot2.htm http://www.hirhome.com/israel/mprot3.htm and http://www.hirhome.com/israel/mprot4.htm to find any innaccuracies.

-

No, No == == - 		 - 	The article you cite is in fundamental error and is full of inaccuracies. FGW is clearly biased in the source material chosen to buttress his claims that appear adopted in the absence of fact. Selective citations of record material chosen simply to illustrate what he speculates is hardly objective and certainly not an adequate basis for explaining public events. He and you seem incapable of doing effective research and the numerous factual errors in this work don't provide confidence. That's why ignorance is not a virtue and the arrogance on which it is based continues to show through in your comments. You have let a propaganda vehicle drive your misconceptions.

Blanket Statements
Blanket statements calling articles 'propaganda' or the like do nothing to support your point of view. Please provide detailed descriptions of actual factual claims that are in error, otherwise desist in what is essentially vandalism of a wikipedia article for which your IP address can be banned.

Propaganda
The source articles referred to are well-known propaganda vehicles and are not taken seriously in scholarly circles. In addition the use of this sort of material violates wikipedia standards. If you have specific claims that you sincerely wish to verify, then ask the question and either accept or reject the response. This is a much more honest approach than citing hatchet jobs by persons with an agenda.