User talk:Vincecrystal

Wikipedia sticks to mainstream academic and journalistic sources
See WP:RS and WP:FRINGE for more details. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:04, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * By the way, while you are entitled to remove this message, you are not allowed to call it vandalism, per (again) WP:NPA and WP:NOTVAND. If you use the edit summary "removing possible vandalism" when removing these messages again, that's just going to be taken as more evidence for a WP:NOTHERE block. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:14, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:23, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note for other admins: this user came here to complain about a movie while pushing some conspiracy theory that "wikipedia admins have pretty much sabotaged this article", and after being told to work on the encyclopedia, he decided that the best way to do that was to say that a guy who sells "no touch" martial arts (that are ineffective if someone just doesn't believe in them) is somehow not fraudulent and that the Sandy Hook victims are faking it and that the Pizzagate conspiracy theory is anything besides an delusional sham. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:26, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Unblock Request
Vincecrystal (talk) 20:18, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * See WP:NOTTHEM for why this appeal is going to be declined. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:20, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

I believe I followed all of the appropriate steps. By the way, pressure points do not take belief. They are scientifically proven to exist.

This account is ✅ to. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  21:00, 9 June 2018 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  18:26, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * So even if he is unblocked for then above he will just get re-blocked for socking?Slatersteven (talk) 10:16, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * in response to your claim of not making PA's  "you have anger management problems." is a breach of our civility guidelines, "I do not want to offend this generation of children and their liberal values." is a PA pure and simple.Slatersteven (talk) 10:19, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Slatersteven, I converted this to a checkuser block yesterday with talkpage access revoked. He will have to either use UTRS or file an appeal with ArbCom if he wants to be unblocked.
 * Then I would apologize to him for making an accusation he is unable to answer.Slatersteven (talk) 18:38, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

Yes I know he cannot respond, and has been blocked. But this may need to be kept an eye on.Slatersteven (talk) 08:42, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Note to the reported user. I had no issue with you (in your own words) having a rant about Wikipedia. But you also called for people to try and get an admin blocked. That is canvasing and is unacceptable.Slatersteven (talk) 08:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC)