User talk:Vincedumond

WP:OVERLINKING
Generally, we link only to the first instance of a term in an article. You created the third link to Brendan Dassey in the Steven Avery article. You also unnecessarily and inappropriately removed a "citation needed" tag. How about if you fix your mistakes? 32.218.47.208 (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC)


 * OK, you fixed the removal of the "citation needed" tag, but you added a bare URL. How about if you format the citation properly? 32.218.47.208 (talk) 20:07, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! 32.218.47.208 (talk) 20:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of the papacy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Claremont and Byzantines ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/History_of_the_papacy check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/History_of_the_papacy?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Avignon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celtic ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/History_of_Avignon check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/History_of_Avignon?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Using Wikipedia as a source
I have reverted your edits to Battle of Roosebeke since all were sites that state the article is taken from Wikipedia. Wikipedia can not be used to reference Wikipedia articles. --Kansas Bear (talk) 04:57, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Vincedumond, does it really say this on your user page, "Excellence in reference sources is important to me"? Given the number of times these issues have been raised, it's a good idea for you to start taking them seriously, since you could be blocked for a. continuing to drop in unverified content b. making a mockery of WP:RS and c. being unresponsive, uncollaborative, uncollegial. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:13, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * And on Holyrood Abbey, please respect the existing format--a bibliography with short footnotes, not complete citations in every note. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:33, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You said, "You asked me if my striving toward excellence was serious. I cannot recall a time when my entries continued to drop in unverified content or makde a mockery of WP:RS or were unresponsive, uncollaborative,or uncollegial. My efforts are genuinely true to my goal of improving Wikipedia. The high number of contributions I see on Wikipedia without citations from verifiable or reliable sources is quite high. I try to decrease those calls for citation needed." (You said this in a completely unrelated section; let's keep it here.) Well, many of your edits do add reliable sources--though, as I noted once or twice, you should respect the existing format. I now know what your formatting style is, and it's fine, but you shouldn't use that if there's already a different format in the article. My comment was prompted, really, by the strange edits on Battle of Roosebeke. If you add what is obviously something that looks like Wikipedia to cite a Wikipedia article, then one has to doubt you realized what you were doing. It would have been funny if that mirror had updated itself to include your citation of their mirror article. In that case that article would be citing itself also. Drmies (talk) 15:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you
I appreciate your candid explanation. Im now learning how to do the entries for the abbreviated format. I prefer the abrevistrd format but i dont know how to enter it after a contribution. Can you guide me? Vincedumond 15:56, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Vincedumond, I'm not sure if I understand the question. I assume you're not asking about that "sfn" or "harv" format? Because whenever I have to use that, I just copy what I see, or I ask . Which edit/article/citation are you pointing to? Drmies (talk) 17:52, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey, if I don't get back to you quickly, sorry--I found some plagiarism in that Hundred Years War article I have to deal with first. Drmies (talk) 17:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Ninety-Nines


A tag has been placed on The Ninety-Nines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. nearlyevil 665  18:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Charles Cooke


A tag has been placed on Thomas Charles Cooke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. nearlyevil 665  18:08, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Frederick James Carmichael


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Frederick James Carmichael, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Chief Minister      (Talk)   18:10, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Victor Robert Bennett


A tag has been placed on Victor Robert Bennett requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. nearlyevil 665  18:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Paul Michael "Mike" Cooper-Slipper


A tag has been placed on Thomas Paul Michael "Mike" Cooper-Slipper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. nearlyevil 665  18:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Creating articles with only a single link
Hi, I've noticed you have created 5 articles with nothing but a link as content. If you are trying to build up a draft from scratch I'd recommend starting the page as a draft, see Wikipedia:Drafts. The articles you created as they currently stand are not ready for mainspace and have been tagged for speedy deletion. If you have any questions let me know. nearlyevil 665  18:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)