User talk:Vincej

'''Please feel free to comment on any of my contributions.

Many thanks.'''

Nursing
________________

Great work

 * Wonderful job on Nursing ethics! -THB 13:37, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Category:Nurses
Hi Vince, I sincerely sympathize with your concern, and I'm not entirely surprised that someone was unhappy about that. If there was some way to put it lower down on the page, I assuredly would have done so. FYI, I also added the same link on Category:Physicians, after I discovered that Category:Doctors convicted of murdering their patients was no longer a sub-cat. The problem is that it's name was changed in a recent CFD. With the new name & scope, it no longer works as a sub-cat of either profession, and I'm concerned that readers are unlikely to think to look for it in the parent cat, Category:People in health professions. I myself did not agree with the renaming; I argued for profession-specific categories. I don't think anybody foresaw the problem that would be created by removing the category from its former parent.

Hmmm. Tell you what -- I'm going to revert the edit for now, and try to come up with a better solution. Regards, Cgingold (talk) 13:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

RE: Health coaching
I've replied on the talk page. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs) 13:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Tidal model
Just noticed your nice work on this article, was just wondering about it the other day so I was really glad to see it already created. I've been working on Recovery model and it seems we should get the two to link to each other. EverSince (talk) 17:24, 2 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I've had a go at inserting a brief summary of it to Recovery model, which you might want to improve. I put it after the psych rehab points as it seems to come from a professional setting... Cheers EverSince (talk) 12:16, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Or to expand of course... EverSince (talk) 16:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Good point...kept thinking when adding more different aspects to that section that it was getting quite long and jumbled. Will address it there. EverSince (talk) 18:21, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

About my list on Barack Obama
"I was responsible for tagging your article on articles about Obama..."

Thanks for being up front about it;

and indeed for elaborating your views on the subject.

However, it wasn't an article about articles,

but a list---which are common in wikipedia.

RHaworth deleted it on the grounds that it was redundant, and he showed where to my great satisfaction.

Thanks for the greetings and (otherwise) kind words. ;-)

Cheers,

Yartett (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Traumatic brain injury
Hi! I see from your user page that you're a nurse who's interested in health care and mental health. I've been working on the TBI article and wondered if you'd mind taking a look at it, particularly the rehabilitation and complications sections. There's a peer review open, or the talk page would work fine. Surprisingly, there's really little mental health info in the article, I'm afraid I might have introduced an emergency and acute time frame bias. Anyway, if you have time and would like to take a look, great, otherwise no worries. Thanks much! Peace, delldot   &nabla;.  23:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Would appreciate your input on Psychiatric and mental health nursing
Hi mate! I'd like to change the redirect structure on your article, Psychiatric_and_mental_health_nursing, wondered if you could check out my note on the talk page? Basie (talk) 10:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IVCS logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:IVCS logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Terry's of York.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Terry's of York.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 05:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Disability
I have noticed that you are interested in articles related to disability, so I'd like to invite you to participate in WP:WikiProject Disability. Roger (talk) 16:17, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Sentiments
That change at Ken Robinson wasn't a nice sentiment - see Articles for deletion/My Dear Sweet Heart and Avinash patra. Peridon (talk) 15:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Interesting. Good job I reverted it. -- Vince (talk) 14:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Penge
Since you posted comments on the Penge Wikipedia page about the class of the article, I have been slowly trying to bring it up to scratch. I have now sought a peer review and would like to invite you back home to Penge to see what you think of the improvements and offer any suggestions. One has already come up (the Penge Murders are mentioned a couple of times but they are not directly referenced). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bebofpenge (talk • contribs) 05:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Help us improve wikimeets by filling in the UK Wikimeet survey!
Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:
 * https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JJMNVVD

Thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 19:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sleaford Mods - Invisible Britain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Mental health law in Canada has been nominated for merging
Category:Mental health law in Canada has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:17, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)