User talk:Vincent60030/Archive 4

Your GA nomination of London congestion charge
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article London congestion charge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 14:21, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. :) Vincent60030 (talk) 14:37, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of London congestion charge
The article London congestion charge you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:London congestion charge for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 16:41, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, but having just seen what wrote above, in retrospect I think a fail was going to be the only realistic option I'm afraid, as two weeks ago he dropped some serious hints that the article was nowhere near ready - and it isn't. David's a good editor for London Transport articles so it's worth working together with him if possible.  is another editor who's worth getting to know as he knows all the railway templates (that make my head hurt) inside out back to front upside down. I really hope you do carry on editing articles, but it might be worth getting one of those two to check over an article before you nominate it for GA in future, just to be on the safe side. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)  17:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks anyways. :) Vincent60030 (talk) 10:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Just a note about teams, although one person has to actually open the GA nomination, anyone can fix issues raised by the reviewer. For example, Denmark Street was a three way collaboration, though I handled the "paperwork", the actual edits to the article were more or less split evenly. Teams and respect takes some time though, you basically have to show others that you do good writing work - I can't think of any shortcuts, sadly. But all I can say is that if you do good work, people will notice, and mutual collaboration is (imho) one of the nicest surprises Wikipedia can throw at you. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Strongly agree to your statement. Thanks for reviewing it anyways. I will fix all those issues mentioned and let the rest who are good at the topic improve it further. All the best and keep editing! :) Vincent60030 (talk) 16:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I decided to start off by assisting with other people's GA reviews, with the idea of progressing to nomination, and finally carrying out actual reviews. So far, you'll find my name on 20 or so GA review pages:

Talk:Axholme Joint Railway/GA1; Talk:Bedminster railway station/GA1; Talk:Crystal Palace railway station/GA1; Talk:Death Is the Only Answer/GA1; Talk:District Railway/GA1; Talk:District Railway/GA2; Talk:Enlightenment (Doctor Who)/GA1; Talk:Female genital mutilation/GA1; Talk:Filton Abbey Wood railway station/GA1; Talk:Hastings Line/GA1; Talk:Hawkhurst Branch Line/GA1; Talk:Love & Monsters/GA1; Talk:Montpelier railway station/GA1; Talk:Morden tube station/GA1; Talk:Rose (Doctor Who)/GA1; Talk:Sea Mills railway station/GA1; Talk:The Unquiet Dead/GA1; Talk:Victoria line/GA1; Talk:Yoko Ono/GA4.


 * but none of them have me as the actual reviewer. I think that I was the nominator in only one case (not listed, see later), but in all these listed I was there mainly to make in-passing responses to either the nominator or the reviewer. In a few cases (like the Yoko Ono one) I went there in response to a general call at some noticeboard or other. Not listed is Talk:NBR 224 and 420 Classes/GA1 - although I wrote most of the article, and, I wasn't at all involved in the GA. It passed. -- Red rose64 (talk) 19:20, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, appreciate that. When I'm free, I will come over and improve London congestion charge with you. :) Vincent60030 (talk) 01:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Angel tube station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Angel tube station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 12:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

The article Angel tube station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Angel tube station for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 12:20, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

The article Angel tube station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Angel tube station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 13:21, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Acknowledgement
The addition to your talk page is very kind, and I am touched by your courtesy! Thank you.  Tim riley  talk    16:30, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome. This is because we must appreciate what we have now and what good things that other have done for/to us. ;) Vincent60030 (talk) 16:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Angel
Thanks for having expanded "Angel" article! I've already translated it on Italian Wikipedia ^-^ Good job! --Alpha Islington (talk) 11:38, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

It's my pleasure to help Wikipedia by contributing to articles of my interest. I appreciate that comment as well and also thanks for translating it on Italian Wikipedia. :) Vincent60030 (talk) 15:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Acton Town tube station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Acton Town tube station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rcsprinter123 -- Rcsprinter123 (talk) 21:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

The article Acton Town tube station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Acton Town tube station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rcsprinter123 -- Rcsprinter123 (talk) 19:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Acton Town tube station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stonebridge Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 14 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Acton Town tube station page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=656418119 your edit] caused a redundant parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F656418119%7CActon Town tube station%5D%5D Ask for help])

HI ZHINN YWE OR ZHONN YWE OR JHON WE
LOL — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProfChaos25 (talk • contribs) 09:12, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Hey, Hi! Check out my user page! (I think you did). Oh and pls sign your comment with four tildes given at the bottom of the edit page. Vincent60030 (talk) 01:33, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Angel tube station
Hello! Your submission of Angel tube station at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:05, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Angel tube station
Harrias talk 12:02, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arnos Grove tube station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Arnos Grove tube station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheMagikCow -- TheMagikCow (talk) 13:20, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

The article Arnos Grove tube station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Arnos Grove tube station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheMagikCow -- TheMagikCow (talk) 13:41, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Spam on Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects
Why did you re-add the spam to Articles for creation/Redirects? Are you using some sort of automated tool to automatically undo changes to that page, or do you really think that blatant advertising for a spell caster is an appropriate use for that page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChocolateMouchoirs (talk • contribs) 15:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)


 * No, I didn't re-add the spam. It's already gone. Yes, I use twinkle to revert spams and vandalisms. Vincent60030 (talk) 15:06, 30 June 2015 (UTC)


 * You clearly re-added spam to the page with this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Redirects&diff=669341978&oldid=669341673 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChocolateMouchoirs (talk • contribs) 15:09, 30 June 2015 (UTC)


 * It's now gone alright? And pls sign your comments with four tildes provided at the top of the edit summary. Vincent60030 (talk) 15:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)