User talk:Vincente1

Proposed deletion of Eric Adu
Hello, Vincente1. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Eric Adu, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Eric Adu to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 19:43, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eric adu


A tag has been placed on Eric adu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ► LowLevel (talk) 08:37, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kwabena Agouda with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 11:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Jim, how are you doing. Yes is true I did some changes but thanks for restoring the editing. I want to do exact thing for one of players to have details on Wikipedia. How can I go about it. Vincente1 (talk) 11:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eric Adu


The article Eric Adu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. OnionRing (talk) 22:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eric Adu


A tag has been placed on Eric Adu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 22:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Eric Adu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric Adu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Eric Adu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shirt58 (talk) 11:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eric Adu


A tag has been placed on Eric Adu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Non-Dropframe    talk  13:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eric Adu
Hello, Vincente1. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Eric Adu, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Eric Adu to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

TonyBallioni (talk) 15:48, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Eric Adu, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:53, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eric Adu


The article Eric Adu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:00, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eric Adu


A tag has been placed on Eric Adu, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Eric Adu
All articles on living people need to be WP:INLINECITED. Without this, the reader can't see where each point has come from, and so can't easily use it for research. It also puts others editing, because it's all so unclear and means it can't reach Good or Featured Article. Please WP:INLINECITE this article. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 09:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eric Adu


A tag has been placed on Eric Adu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Eric Adu, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. ''Repeatedly recreating deleted articles can be disruptive. Please stop.'' Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:24, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Eric Adu


Hello, Vincente1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eric Adu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 02:03, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Vintels sports agency
'''Vintel Sports Agency is a Ghanaian company providing agent services for footballers.

The company was founded by Vincent Okantah.

Done Vincente1 (talk) 22:37, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Current
Vintels Sports Agency provide agency services for the following players:


 * 🇬🇭 Nafiu Iddrisu
 * 🇬🇭 James Bissue
 * 🇬🇭 Gilbert Fiamenyo
 * 🇬🇭 Kofi Koomson
 * 🇬🇭 Eric Adu
 * 🇬🇭 Nana Egyir
 * 🇬🇭 Benjamin Akuffo
 * 🇬🇭 Azume Adams
 * 🇬🇭 Juliet Acheampong
 * 🇬🇭 Razak abdul Agyir

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Vincente1


A tag has been placed on User:Vincente1, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 損齋 (talk) 05:10, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Vincente1 (talk) 05:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Don't want this page to be deleted because all the information I have provided is true about my company and can do the necessary background check.

Thanks

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. You user page is for you to tell us about your activities on Wikipedia, not to promote your company, Even as an article i would have deleted it because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation company, press releases, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company organisation claims or interviewing its management. Your only reference didn't work.  Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
 * I can't see any claim of notability, there are no facts about the company at all. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits. representing notable footballers doesn't make your company notable
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also guidance for editors with conflicts of interest.
 * since it's your own company, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . Please provide the required disclosure. note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Before attempting to write an article again, please check that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and make sure that you can find independent third party sources. Also read this important guidance. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Eric adu


Hello, Vincente1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eric adu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hasteur (talk) 04:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vintels sports agency (March 14)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Vintels_sports_agency Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the company.

This draft reads like a directory entry, but Wikipedia is not a directory. This draft does not establish notability.

This draft has no references. Notability cannot be established without references. Do not resubmit this draft without references.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Vintels sports agency


Hello, Vincente1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vintels sports agency".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:02, 21 September 2019 (UTC)