User talk:Vincentjuice

May 2017
The article David Font-Navarrete was unsuitable for Wikipedia, and has been deleted. There were several problems, the two most important being that it was written in an unambiguously promotional tone, and that at least part of it was copied from another source, which we cannot accept for copyright reasons. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:07, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Font-Navarrete (May 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:David Font-Navarrete may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe deckertalk 14:54, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

After you had been told that the page you created was unacceptable because it was promotional and because of copyright concerns, simply re-creating the same page was not helpful. I note that the second time you submitted it as a draft rather than posting to directly as an article, but it is highly unlikely that the draft would have been reviewed by someone who would have accepted anything so promotional, even if she or he had failed to notice the copyright problem. If you would like to continue editing Wikipedia then I very strongly recommend following the advice I posted above, because if you continue in the way you have been doing then at best you are likely to find that work you do keeps getting deleted, and at worst you may be blocked from editing by an administrator. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vincentjuice/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 15 May 2017 (UTC)