User talk:Vincentnufcr1

December 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hans Keller with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 02:01, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ignaz Brüll with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 02:01, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 02:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Jacques Offenbach
Hi. Regarding your edit here, please see my own posting on the same subject Cologne_is_not_a_Prussian_city. -- Klein zach  07:16, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Germans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to German Republic


 * Ilan Ramon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Israeli

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Germans. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please do not keep adding the same edit on the page. It really contains very bad grammar and does not even make sense in some segments. Example: In 1866, the long ending feud between Austria and Prussia finally came to an end. There was a few reasons what was behind this war.... You should discuss these edits on the talkpage of the article instead of edit-warring'' Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 00:26, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Judging from their edits and obsession with Germany and Austria, I think this editor may be the same person who had been previously blocked for tendentious editing. Perhaps worth looking into this. Malljaja (talk) 14:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Excuse me?--Vincentnufcr1 (talk) 23:58, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I left a message at the other editor's talkpage and invited them to talk to you on the article talk before reverting any further. This edit war has to stop and because of the rules of WP:3RR it should not continue. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 18:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Ian-Kershaw-free-for-world-use credit-James-Pearson-University-of-Sheffieldianphoto1.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Ian-Kershaw-free-for-world-use credit-James-Pearson-University-of-Sheffieldianphoto1.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 19 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The image seems to be a copyright violation; see the T&Cs of the source website. - David Biddulph (talk) 13:06, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

What should I do then?--Vincentnufcr1 (talk) 00:22, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The file has now been deleted, and the link from Ian Kershaw, so there's nothing to do, unless you want to try to find a file for which you could give an appropriate reply to the copyright question. - David Biddulph (talk)

I do believe his article should have a picture on, how do I go about getting one? Would it be possible to ask that site to use it with permission on Wikipedia via the net or not?--Vincentnufcr1 (talk) 13:34, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Ethnic Germans. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Emmanuelle Béart. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 19:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Courtney Peldon. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg (talk) 19:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Germany, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dave (djkernen)|Talk to me|Please help! 04:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC)