User talk:Vincentupsdellred

Welcome!
Hello, Vincentupsdellred, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! White Arabian Filly Neigh 21:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edits in history articles
Hello Vincentupsdellred, thank you for your efforts to improve these history articles. However, I have reverted some of these edits: Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source itself and should not be used as reference. Also, the usage of overly precise dates in sub-articles can be problematic and redundant. It's better (imo) to present and explain these precise dates in the main articles, where additional context can be provided (especially when articles refer to dates over 1,000+ years ago). GermanJoe (talk) 23:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Anna Fortunato Brivio
Hi, I'm PamD. Vincentupsdellred, thanks for creating Anna Fortunato Brivio!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Did she do anything to make her notable in her own right, not just as someone else's mother?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Pam D  23:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anna Fortunato Brivio


A tag has been placed on Anna Fortunato Brivio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Pam D  23:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Anna Fortunato Brivio for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anna Fortunato Brivio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Anna Fortunato Brivio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pam D  06:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Vincentupsdellred, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Fibonacci have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Your addition to Joseph Fourier has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:34, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

TheFamousPeople.com as a source
Hi Vincentupsdellred. I noticed that you used thefamouspeople.com as a source in Daniel Defoe. Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. (Discussions here and here). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 16:36, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Ronz I sincerely apologize for using a substandard source in my editing. I hope I don't do that again.
 * Vincentupsdellred (talk) 21:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * No apology needed. We all make mistakes, and it's a common problem to use what appears to be a helpful reference. --Ronz (talk) 01:46, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

 * I'm sorry I didn't make it to the elections, but I didn't know about this particular election until today, December 6th, at 4:45 PM. Please forgive me for my absence.

Vincentupsdellred (talk) 21:47, 6 December 2018 (UTC):