User talk:Vineviz

Hello Vineviz
I left a note/comment for you at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Music_of_Italy after your entry in the discussion. Man, this is a confusing way to communicate. My email address is on my user page if you want. Thank you for the suggestions and comments. Jeffmatt 07:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Music of Italy
Hello, again. At

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Music_of_Italy#My_kingdom_for_an_outline.21

I have put up a proposal for rearranging that article. When you get some time, have a look. Jeffmatt 07:26, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Empty articles
Articles you have created of Italian bands are empty and as such are not consistent with Guide to layout or even Stub. At a minimum, you should seek to provide essential information (3–10 sentences). Thanks. Accurizer 14:59, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your comments on the Italian band stubs. I intend to supply at least a little content for each of these stubs (and much more for some), but wanted to get them categorized first so I didn't lose track of them. Vineviz 15:04, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Music of Italy
Hello, again. Since you have worked on the Music of Italy article, note that it is now on the peer review list (at or near the top of the list) at Peer review. We'll see what happens to it. I think it looks ok. I see you are interested in Cassino. As in Battle of...? I went up there a couple of weeks ago with a 92-year old friend of mine and veteran of the entire WW2 campaign. We even stopped at San Pietro, site of the famous battle and John Huston film. Jeffmatt 15:56, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Scholarship removal?
Why did you remove the information about the scholarship for University of Cassino. That was relevant information, and is completely factual.

Please respond at xo-alana@hotmail.com
 * There is nothing about this scholarship that merits inclusion in an encylopedic article on the town of Cassino. Wiki vanity guidelines are quite clear, in my opinion. Vineviz 18:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Problems With Genetics in Wiki Articles
Thanks for the help on the Cimbri article. I have decided not to mess with any stuff written by that particular party. Too much sound and fury.

Have you had a look at the R1b article lately? It's an incredible jumble. Stevo343 (talk) 19:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Re Niliu
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Re Niliu, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Re Niliu seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Re Niliu, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

R1b
Hi Vince. I noticed that you have some knowledge of R1b. As you correctly highlighted, ht 35 and 15, so called modal types, are RFLPs. Do you know how ht 35 - the 'Anatolian modal type' discussed by Pericic and Cionnoglu regarding their prevalence in eastern Europe and Anatolia - fit in with the newly discussed subhalogroups of R1b found by Myres and Cruciani ? - L 23 ? Hxseek (talk) 08:24, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

WP:HGH
Suggestion: add yourself to the list, and "watch" WP:HGH?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 11:34, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Can you help with any observations about possible sources for Albania?
Just in case you can help in this discussion: ,.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 08:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Banda Cittá Ruvo Di Puglia


The article Banda Cittá Ruvo Di Puglia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unreferenced music group article of unclear notability; tagged as unreferenced since 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 12:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

WP:BLP
Please be more careful: the content you restored contains a serious BLP violation--that claim is NOT verified in the cited source or anywhere else in the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of San Joaquin Figs
Hello Vineviz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged San Joaquin Figs for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lithopsian (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Barabàn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barabàn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Barabàn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Boleyn (talk) 13:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of La Lionetta


The article La Lionetta has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn't meet WP:NBAND / WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of La Lionetta for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La Lionetta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/La Lionetta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Boleyn (talk) 18:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)