User talk:Vingthorr

April 2019
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Carl Benjamin page
I started a copy of the page for Carl Benjamin on another wiki. Copied the Wikipedia article to it. Feel free to go there and correct it as you see fit. https://en.wikialpha.org/wiki/Carl_Benjamin Mathewignash (talk) 17:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, you may be blocked from editing. ''

WP:BLP applies to talk pages, as well as articles. Figure out a way to discuss this issue without personal insults.'' Grayfell (talk) 21:11, 4 May 2019 (UTC) You are a real kidder too aren't you? Would be simple if your bias wasn't so evident in talk. I have a bias too, but I am not trying to hand wave reality. You don't want to include that she clearly laughed, and she admits it. Its SO bad that no one will report on it cause she seems to be a protected resource and people are tripping over themselves so the truth of her callous actions that started it doesn't come out. "Find a reliable source", apparently the primary one doesn't count and it can't be stated that she laughed at a parliamentary meeting.