User talk:Vinodhchennu

Welcome!

 * }

Request for help
Hi Vinod i have created a page for education pedagogy, which is very prominent is Asia and is a new phenomenon in India.but has been nominated fo speedy deletion which was not right as it would have been of great help for indian parents. Can you help. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrysaalis_i_math — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bishwa 777 (talk • contribs) 04:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Vinodh Reddy Chennu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vinodh Reddy Chennu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vinodh Reddy Chennu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 04:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Engineering education in India. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Psychonaut (talk) 07:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive and unhelpful editing, including, but not necessarily restricted to, the following. (1) Editing Wikipedia mostly for the purpose of promotion, in various ways, including adding spam links to articles (including links to the web site of at least one business that you have stated you work for), posting links to your own web site, your Twitter account, etc, and creating a promotional article about yourself. (2) Repeatedly removing other editors' comments and other content from a deletion discussion relating to your self-promotional article, repeatedly removing the deletion discussion notice from the same article, and repeatedly removing the transclusion of the same deletion discussion, evidently in an attempt to prevent the discussion from taking place. (3) Using sockpuppet accounts both to attempt to disrupt the deletion discussion (by such methods as described above) and also to attempt to give the misleading impression of independent support in the discussion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:43, 12 October 2015 (UTC)