User talk:Vinrpm.p6054

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, Vinrpm.p6054, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to United States Air Force seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BilCat (talk) 05:37, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

List of active Indian military aircraft
DO NOT over crowd articles with image(s) per WP:IMAGEMOS. Further do not engaged in an edit warring, you are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users. If you have a specific issue take it up on the talk page of that article, & discuss it there. - Thank you FOX 52 (talk) 14:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, I'm HaeB. I noticed that you recently removed content from Indian road network without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. HaeB (talk) 09:02, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Economy of India. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your edit contradicted the cited reference. David Biddulph (talk) 16:13, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Economy of India. Yet again you contradicted the cited reference. David Biddulph (talk) 09:33, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Pakistan International Airlines, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Multiple reverts
I have made multiple reverts to edits by you. The main reason is making changes without citing any references and the absence of reasons for your edits. Not adding an explanation for an edit is guaranteed to attract attention, it is in your own interests to give a reason. If you want your edits to stick, you must provide sources. It is important that you build a reputation for trustworthiness in Wikipedia; your track record for reverts and no citations is noted and right now you need to do a lot of work to rebuild trust. I encourage you to keep editing but: give explanations, provide sources. E x nihil (talk) 20:19, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Boeing AH-64 Apache unexplained deletion
Hello, I noticed that you recently removed content from Boeing AH-64 Apache without any explanation why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with a clear and accurate edit summary. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. ''Please provide valid reason(s) for your edit in the edit summary field. '' -Fnlayson (talk) 22:02, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pune, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that.

I noticed your edit to Pune does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 17:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I second GreaterPonce. You have made unexplained and frankly unnecessary deletions on Brigade Road too. Please follow Ponce's advice and use the edit summaries. Looking at your contribs, it appears that you make a lot of unexplained deletions; please refrain from doing so in the future. Best, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk) 16:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hyderabad, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that.    Pro lix 💬 13:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Islamic terrorism, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.--GenoV84 (talk) 15:11, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 20:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Wire (India), you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate Talk 01:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, please do not add international flights to Indira Gandhi International Airport or Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport without including a reference indicating that the flight is currently being operated. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 14:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Narendra Modi, you may be blocked from editing. TheWikiholic (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Russian flag on 2021 Formula One World Championship
Hi, the flags on 2021 Formula One World Championship are for the countries that the circuits are located in. The Sochi Autodrom is in the country of Russia, even if drivers and teams cannot use the Russian flag when competing, and so we use Russian flag. Same as how the Emilia Romagna Grand Prix at Imola uses Italian flag (because it's in Italy). There was a discussion about this a few years ago at WT:F1, any changes would need to be discussed there. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Your edit to Red Bull Racing has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. TylerBurden (talk) 16:52, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Information.svg Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Delhi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  17:03, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Information orange.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Delhi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please note per WP:BRD you need to take your concerns to the article's talk page and seek a consensus. Be warned edit-warring is not a good idea.  Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  19:14, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Please don't engage in boosterism (the world's largest this and that) as you did in this edit with no edit summary in which you replaced one picture and removed another without the benefit of any edit summary. Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  20:21, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Delhi, you may be blocked from editing.  Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  15:23, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Important information
You appear not to have received this message within the last year:

Best regards, Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  17:03, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Copyright violations
This is now getting out of hand, every image you have added to Red Bull Racing has been removed as copyright violations. You do not seem to understand how it works, I highly suggest you read all the links in the warning above. The next time you add copyright violations to this article I'll start a WP:AN/I if that's what it will take to get you to stop. Seriously, copyright is no joke. Stop. --TylerBurden (talk) 09:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.TylerBurden (talk) 06:35, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Vinrpm.p6054, I suggest that you visit the discussion referred to above, read and understand it, and comment there to reassure other editors and admins that the issues mentioned will not be an ongoing problem. If you don't do that then there is a chance that an admin might block you to protect the encyclopedia from disruption. I'm sure you have good intentions, but this is a collaborative environment, and your fellow editors need to be confident that you will not cause further disruption going forward. Here is a link to the discussion: . Good luck. Begoon 01:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I should have mentioned additionally that you really need to read
 * Image use policy and
 * Non-free content
 * to understand what images you can upload, and how to do so without any copyright issues. It's a little bit complicated to take in all at once, so if you do have questions then the best thing to do BEFORE uploading any future images is to go to


 * Media copyright questions
 * where experienced editors can help with any questions you have. Begoon 11:14, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Max Verstappen


A tag has been placed on List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Max Verstappen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Max Verstappen. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 15:57, 25 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, Vinrpm.p6054,
 * An article on this subject was deleted through an AFD discussion, linked above. You are free to create a draft version and submit it to AFC for review and approval. That is the only way I'm aware of to overcome an AFD "Delete" decision. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:37, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Women's sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Women's Premier League. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)