User talk:Vinstreak

October 2016
Your recent edit to Parkland High School (Pennsylvania) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 19:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Parkland High School (Pennsylvania). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

Please stop. You're new and I'd hate to see you get blocked over this. Start a discussion on the talk page and show with reliable sources independent of the school how he meets WP:N. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 19:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits to Parkland High School (Pennsylvania)
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edits may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Widefox ; talk 22:23, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Parkland High School (Pennsylvania) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. John from Idegon (talk) 22:43, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. GABgab 02:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * You are way past 3RR. Meters (talk) 02:29, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Parkland High School (Pennsylvania) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Parkland High School (Pennsylvania) was changed by Vinstreak (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959072 on 2016-10-18T02:35:20+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Parkland High School (Pennsylvania). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Nik ol ai Ho ☎️ 02:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Guðrún P. Helgadóttir, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 02:43, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Guðrún P. Helgadóttir. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Guðrún P. Helgadóttir was changed by Vinstreak (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.979827 on 2016-10-18T02:44:30+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:44, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 54 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Parkland High School (Pennsylvania). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 02:47, 18 October 2016 (UTC)