User talk:VintageHistory

Order of Saint John (chartered 1888)
Before deleting large blocks of cited/referenced text in article Order of Saint John (chartered 1888), could you please discuss abt it on the talk page? Thank you. The Yeti 06:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Anne McGrath, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Sum mer PhD v2.0 18:06, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Remember edit summaries
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Executive Order 11110 did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Regards, -- Thinker78  (talk) 06:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Executive Order 11110, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:27, 23 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The Assassination theory has nothing to do with the Executive Order 1110. If you want to wiki the theory then do it under the JFK Assassination theory pages not this on.  Leave this to unfettered reporting.  There are plenty of JFK assassination theories in wiki VintageHistory (talk) 17:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Still required proper explanation in at least an edit summary, per Achieving consensus Through editing,
 * But given that your removal has been reverted, then what applies is, also per Achieving consensus Through editing,
 * The content dispute should better be discussed in the Executive Order 11110 article talk page, so editors who watch the page can provide their input. Regards, Thinker78  (talk) 19:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Why is it necessary to add a fringe theory to an item talking about a Presidential Executive Order? (1) Such inclusion leads the reader to believe that the assassination theory was the only historical reaction to the Order, (2) including this conspiracy fringe theory only gives voice to the theorist, even if it is negative in tone from the one including the theory, (3) there are many more important historical implications of this Order that one wild fringe attempt to implicate an important Presidential action.
 * I can see from your persistent to add this to your page on E.O. 11110 that you are certain the assassination theory has some credence in its own right . . and on that point please continue on with it, I will leave to you and your stupidity to blemish Pres. Kennedy with outlandish stupidity.  And while you're at it why not include some information on space aliens from Mars as President Kennedy was a strong supporter of the Space Program. VintageHistory (talk) 20:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are displaying uncivilized behavior I can see you are trying to impose a point of view abusively, not trying to collaboratively improve articles. Failing to explain your edits in articles, insulting people, imposing a point of view, edit warring may lead to you being blocked from editing in Wikipedia in the future. Thinker78  (talk) 03:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Funny VintageHistory (talk) 15:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are displaying uncivilized behavior I can see you are trying to impose a point of view abusively, not trying to collaboratively improve articles. Failing to explain your edits in articles, insulting people, imposing a point of view, edit warring may lead to you being blocked from editing in Wikipedia in the future. Thinker78  (talk) 03:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Funny VintageHistory (talk) 15:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)