User talk:Violetriga

DYK for Robin Surgeoner
Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Train graveyard
Hello! Your submission of Train graveyard at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:23, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Owen Pick
Vanamonde (talk) 00:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Brian Santos
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Very kind - I really appreciate that, thank you. violet/riga [talk] 09:35, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Train graveyard
Hello! Your submission of Train graveyard at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Murder of Simon Dale
Hello! Your submission of Murder of Simon Dale at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:52, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 23:06, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Bisexual lighting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bisexual lighting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bisexual lighting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 20:22, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Christopher Little Literary Agency
Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Train graveyard
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Automobile graveyard
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Loney Haskell
Hello! Your submission of Loney Haskell at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Javier Espinoza (talk) 04:47, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Edward Frank Gillett
Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Murder of Simon Dale
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Cockroach farming
Hello! Your submission of Cockroach farming at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Bisexual lighting
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Bisexual lighting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bisexual lighting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bisexual lighting& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lojbanist remove cattle from stage 02:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Don the Talking Dog
Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Robert Pitcairn (athlete)
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Endangered river) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Endangered river, Violetriga!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"A well-written article and a useful addition to Wikipedia."

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:13, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Loney Haskell
Gatoclass (talk) 12:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Quick note
I provided you notice of the discretionary sanctions on alt med and pseudoscience. Your removing them, means that you are aware of them.

If you are not familiar with "discretionary sanctions" please take time to become familiar with them. They fill an important role in Wikipedia and they are placed only on topics where they are needed. I understand you will probably remove this but I do hope you are able to hear this. Jytdog (talk) 21:28, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I await your brilliant version of the article. I think I might be waiting for some time. violet/riga [talk] 21:30, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Alt med and pseudoscience
I will be filing at AE to have you topic banned from editing about health if you keep adding alt-med, pseudoscience-hyping content to Wikipedia. I will not warn you again. If I file this case I have little doubt that the topic ban will be enacted. All I can do is warn you. Jytdog (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Not interested in your politics. I want to work on this ‘’collaborative’’ project. violet/riga [talk] 00:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Jyt, if you weren't aware, violetriga is a former admin and is certainly familiar with the concept of discretionary sanctions. Natureium (talk) 00:05, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Comments like this will be the basis for sanctions. Jytdog (talk) 00:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I think that your comments are more aggressive. I was merely pointing out that perhaps you’re not all-knowing about the topic. violet/riga [talk] 00:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Also this personal attack similar to the one above, as well as comments like the following that show complete disregard for MEDRS: this and especially this (there were zero MEDRS sources) and very especially this was about a pseudoscience=hyping claim that this editor thinks is "fine" because it is attributed. That is an approach to FRINGE topics that would lead WP into the gutter, if everybody followed it. This person is digging their own hole.
 * Not to mention the DYK filing itself which never should have been posted, much less approved. There is no leg to stand on here. Jytdog (talk) 00:14, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I think you have WP:OWN issues. I also think that I’ve been rather well behaved considering your opposition. violet/riga [talk] 00:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * You can think what you like. Your editing about health is unacceptable and you are completely resistant to adjusting it. So, the community will prevent further problems if you continue. Jytdog (talk) 00:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I’ve never been topic-banned before. What’s it like? violet/riga [talk] 00:21, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It is sometimes frustrating. Jytdog (talk) 00:41, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Jytdog. Stop threatening editors. Your viewpoint on what happened on the blood transfusion article leaves out your very questionable behaviour and you have skewed what this editor did in what was good faith.(Littleolive oil (talk) 01:51, 23 May 2018 (UTC))

Blood transfusion
I'm going to have to leave you on this article; I'm way behind on real life work. Best wishes.(Littleolive oil (talk) 00:28, 25 May 2018 (UTC))
 * I know the feeling. Thank you and best wishes. violet/riga [talk] 00:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I saw that you removed the DS tags on this article. They are pretty standard for medical related articles and especially Fringe articles these days. I'll readd them; not sure why Godric removed them again. I'm galloping off to do real life stuff and shouldn't have looked at the article. :O](Littleolive oil (talk) 15:29, 25 May 2018 (UTC))
 * Thanks for that. I considered calling the article ‘fringe’ to be a biased position but I’m willing to concede that it could be called that. violet/riga [talk] 17:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Fringe seems to have taken on a pejorative meaning on WP but all new research is fringe to begin with.:O)(Littleolive oil (talk) 20:32, 25 May 2018 (UTC))

Why did you perform an undo on my edit of the Virginia Dare page?
My description of VDARE is both more accurate and tracks much more precisely with the entry on VDARE. Describing VDARE as "an anti-illegal immigration site" is not only misleading, it verges on outright lying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Desitively (talk • contribs) 00:00, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * There is no reference given to substantiate that claim. I've changed it to "controversial" but that's not ideal. A source (which I'm sure you can find in VDARE) would be the best option. violet/riga [talk] 00:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Well, let's see; there's the VDARE page itself, which openly describes the group as "white nationalist", "white supremacist", "anti-immigration" (not "anti-illegal immigration") and even correctly notes that it is designated a hate group by the SPLC. I mean, I can definitely dig up very specific cites to prove my point and cite it properly on the Virginia Dare entry. I am, however, curious if this is something you have trouble seeing and understanding or if you're being particular about any changes to the page. Although I have to wonder why the Virginia Dare page (and that particular claim for VDARE) merits your extra close attention for you to swoop down on my edit so swiftly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Desitively (talk • contribs) 00:35, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * New accounts are often used for vandalism. I don’t class your edit as vandalism but that’s why it caught my attention. Please do use any reliable source to substantiate the label and then it can remain. violet/riga [talk] 00:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I've moved some material from VDARE into the article, with several sources. Doug Weller  talk 14:54, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 02:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 17:14, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * So, a more narrow venue. Jytdog (talk) 17:14, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Hot water bottle blowing
Alex Shih (talk) 01:26, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Continued warring at Young blood transfusion
As you know there was a recent edit warring complaint about this article which is still on the board. Since my last comment there, you have made this edit. There has been an active disussion on the article talk page, which I referred to in my closure. However, your new change at first glance appears to be continued edit warring. It does not appear to enjoy consensus from the discussion. If you think your change is supported by consensus on talk, can you link to where that occurred? EdJohnston (talk) 16:58, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you look at the recent talk history of that article I made it clear that I intended to make those changes and no comments were forthcoming to oppose their inclusion after 24 hours. Indeed, Roxy the dog said Actually, I don't mind us noting that some nutters in Silicon Valley are spending stupid amounts of money on a ridiculously unproven anti-aging "therapy." so I took that as being support for inclusion for the Silicon Valley trend section. As for the News media section I posted here that I planned to add the content after giving reliable sources and plenty of time for opposition. Since there was no opposition two days later I added it. If Jytdog doesn't engage in conversation I'm not sure how to make any progress. violet/riga [talk] 17:09, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Cockroach farming
Hello! Your submission of Cockroach farming at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Endangered river at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 06:52, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Cockroach farming
Vanamonde (talk) 06:02, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you
Just came to thank you for very interesting articles you're writing. I've translated some of them to Russian and it was very fun to do. I've submitted them to the local DYK as well. Facenapalm (talk) 13:46, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Endangered river
Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Three Dancing Maidens
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan
Hello! Your submission of Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 18:50, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Congratulations! Your hook made the all-time lead hook list! Yoninah (talk) 13:55, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * That's great, thanks. violet/riga [talk] 21:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Lovely - much appreciated, thank you. violet/riga [talk] 21:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Unfinished listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unfinished. Since you had some involvement with the Unfinished redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thanks, 59.149.124.29 (talk) 05:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Participants in World War I moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Participants in World War I, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Discworld character
Template:Infobox Discworld character has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox character. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:58, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Certified Financial Planner™ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Certified Financial Planner™. Since you had some involvement with the Certified Financial Planner™ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:07, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Health
Portal:Health, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Health and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Health during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:23, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Old VfD
Template:Old VfD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 23:06, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Discworld gods for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Discworld gods is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Discworld gods until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 19:01, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Participants in World War I concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Participants in World War I, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

"Jailbreak (disambiguation page)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jailbreak (disambiguation page). Since you had some involvement with the Jailbreak (disambiguation page) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:47, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Participants in World War I


Hello, Violetriga. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Participants in World War I".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Birth weight
Template:Birth weight has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 05:03, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Assessed
Template:Assessed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 12:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Die Berg Komt Er for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Die Berg Komt Er is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Die Berg Komt Er& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. gidonb (talk) 03:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of prolific writers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of prolific writers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of prolific writers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RationalPuff (talk) 18:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:Article templates" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:Article templates. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 15 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.73 (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Stereotypes of animals for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stereotypes of animals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stereotypes of animals& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:52, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

"Olympic medalist" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Olympic medalist and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 16 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 07:21, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Participants in World War I


Hello, Violetriga. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Participants in World War I".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:24, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of animals in film and television for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of animals in film and television is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of animals in film and television until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. An anonymous username, not my real name 03:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Solitaire Meissmer disappearance for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solitaire Meissmer disappearance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Solitaire Meissmer disappearance& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Paul_012 (talk) 20:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Splitting discussion for Clitoris
An article that you have edited or that may interest you, (Clitoris), has content that I have proposed to be removed and moved to another article, (Human clitoris). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 05:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Vehicle explosion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vehicle explosion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vehicle explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:07, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bisexual lighting


The article Bisexual lighting has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article started out as a joke and was referneced into existence. This article has no reason to exist. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bisexual_lighting"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Frigyes06 (talk) 17:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)