User talk:Violetzq/Code Kunst

Peer review
I'm reviewing Violetzq's article. In general, I think you are doing a very good job of improving the quality of the whole article. Through your work, I start to understand more information about Joo Sung-woo. The lead is clear to see, and easy to understand. The content is great with a neutral tone, I see you have added more Sung-woo's personal information. However, it will be better if you can change a sequence to illustrate his life and career. Also, please add at least one picture of Joo Sung-woo and the poster of his album Muggle's Mansion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiajing Liu (talk • contribs) 22:08, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Feedback
The lead is concise and the content is neutral. Also, there are lots of updated references that back up the information very well. It is good to use some template and boxes to make the information about discography present in a clear way. The track listings are informational and detailed. Besides, I will suggest to add more visual images of the actors and the survival shows. For the life part, you could add some information about his school life and stories about his life he might he talked in the interviews. For the survival shows signhere, I suggest to add the his team members’ names and how does he evaluate these competitors. Also, you can add more shows that he attended and write details about the show like why and when he participate the shows. --VikkiX (talk) 22:16, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Peer review for Code Kunst article
Here is the link for my peer review of your article on Code Kunst. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Violetzq/Code_Kunst/Acho98_Peer_Review#Overall_impressions Acho98 (talk) 01:15, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Feedback on your article
Greetings !

You've done a ton of work on the article and it's very much improved!

I made a few small edits to the article to do things like add categories back, and so on. I also had some feedback:


 * You've added a number of factual statements (e.g., being nominated for an award, and so on) that really feel like they should have references. You should try to integrate references for these.
 * A bunch of what you've added feels more like lists of separate facts rather than integrated narrative text. Maybe working together some of the facts you've added (with references) so that they flow as a more narrative encyclopedia article style essay would be helpful?
 * There's a bit of redundancy. You mention Show Me the Money 777 twice, for example. This is probably not necessary.
 * The section on "interviews" seems like random facts and all but the last thing are uncited. If these are notable facts, they might below in a list marked "trivia" or "beliefs" but probably don't belong as sort of unmoored facts in a section on interviews—even if he said these in interviews.

Try to fix these things and then ping me when when you're done by leaving me a message on Wikipedia. I will check your article again. I don't think the article is ready to go live yet. — m a k o ๛  23:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your message on my talk page. I've gone through and done another quick pass making many small edits. You should check out my changes. I think this looks good to go. You should start moving it over whenever you can. Good luck! — m a k o ๛  08:37, 14 February 2020 (UTC)