User talk:Vipulpratap1

Proposed deletion of Anheuser Busch & Campbell Taggart
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Anheuser Busch & Campbell Taggart, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Apparent copyvio of a Harvard business school case - see Harvard business school cases. Unreferenced.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. andy (talk) 23:44, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Business Intelligence Software at SYSCO
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Business Intelligence Software at SYSCO, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Apparent copyvio of a Harvard business school case - see Harvard business school cases. Unreferenced

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. andy (talk) 23:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pillsbury v. Honeywell, Inc.
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pillsbury v. Honeywell, Inc., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Apparent copyvio of a Harvard business school case - see Harvard business school cases and other pages by this editor.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. andy (talk) 23:48, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. andy (talk) 23:50, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ITC e-Choupal Initiative
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article ITC e-Choupal Initiative, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Apparent copyvio of a Harvard business school case - see Harvard business school cases and other pages by this editor.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. andy (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shlensky v. Wrigley
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shlensky v. Wrigley, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Apparent copyvio of a Harvard business school case - see Harvard business school cases and other pages by this editor.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. andy (talk) 23:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Anheuser Busch & Campbell Taggart
An article that you have been involved in editing, Anheuser Busch & Campbell Taggart, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Anheuser Busch & Campbell Taggart. Thank you. andy (talk) 23:47, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

and 5 other related articles andy (talk) 23:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Pillsbury v. Honeywell, Inc.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Pillsbury v. Honeywell, Inc., but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.scribd.com/doc/8631073/Gatech-Business-Cases-and-Articles, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Pillsbury v. Honeywell, Inc. and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Pillsbury v. Honeywell, Inc. with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Pillsbury v. Honeywell, Inc..

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Pillsbury v. Honeywell, Inc. saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Closeapple (talk) 02:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Anheuser Busch & Campbell Taggart listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anheuser Busch &. Since you had some involvement with the Anheuser Busch & Campbell Taggart redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 02:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)