User talk:VirginSound

Your submission at Articles for creation: VirginSound (March 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:VirginSound and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:VirginSound, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:VirginSound Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:VirginSound reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:17, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:26, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

I already stated that I agreed to abide by the rule when I said I'll stick to the rules.

So what else am I to say? VirginSound (talk) 10:21, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Many users promise to abide by the rules but end up not doing so because they don't understand them. You will need to demonstrate your understanding of the rules by specifically responding to the points I make in my decline of your request. You may do so in another unblock request, to be reviewed by someone else.  You will need to specifically agree to not directly make edits that are related to your conflict of interest and tell what other subjects you will edit about instead.  This will help demonstrate your understanding. 331dot (talk) 10:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

I will not directly edit any page that's related to me and I will only edit other articles apart from the ones related to me with the rules stated by being an editor of Wikipedia VirginSound (talk) 10:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You need to state that in another formal unblock request, just as you made your first one. 331dot (talk) 10:38, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

I understand the reason for my account block and I will not directly edit any page related to me for which I was blocked. When I'm unblocked I will will stick to the rules of editing on Wikipedia when editing others page VirginSound (talk) 10:48, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * No one else will see this unless you make another formal unblock request. Out of fairness to you, someone else needs to review your request. 331dot (talk) 11:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

What condition and what questions exactly?

Why are you people making this thing tougher than it is supposed to be? VirginSound (talk) 12:09, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

What condition and what questions exactly?

Why are you people making this thing tougher than it is supposed to be? VirginSound (talk) 12:09, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * See all the questions 331dot asked. Answer each question exactly and specifically. This isn't hard; you were asked questions and didn't answer them. We use this to determine whether you will be capable of editing Wikipedia without problems if unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 12:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

More
Thanks for the email. What you did was to create an account which was the name of your company, which the instructions for choosing a user name specifically forbid, and then used that account to write about your company, which is an obvious conflict of interest. You have worked out how to request a change of name and unblock, and you should realise that if you are unblocked you will have to undertake not to write about your company or anything related to it Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

What can I do to be unblocked now? VirginSound (talk) 08:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

I promise not to do the same thing again... Please give me in detail what I need to write to be unblocked if I can be given the opportunity to be back on Wikipedia. VirginSound (talk) 08:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)


 * re further email, you already know how to request an unblock because you've done it before above. Next time make sure you reply specifically to the points listed by above Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  15:05, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * re further email, you can edit this page. Blocked users re always allowed to edit their own talk page unless that is abused, that's not the case here Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:24, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yamla (talk • contribs) 10:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)