User talk:Visca el barca

License tagging for Image:Centar-Mujke.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Centar-Mujke.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 20:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Janja-mosque.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Janja-mosque.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Kula-grad.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kula-grad.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:02, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. The Evil Spartan 18:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Warning
This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. . Specifically, I'm referring to this unfunny insult. Duja ► 10:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
You have vandalised the jajce article by deleting sourced information relating to the demographics of jajce. It will be fixed shortly Franjo r 02:37, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Also watch your language. I think it's not appropriate to say "clean bullshit" Franjo r 02:41, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello
Selam alejkum prijatelju!

I'm contacting you concerning the Bože pravde article. Saying "watch the news" does not equal giving strong references for your changes. We both know that Republika Srpska is not a country, but the last time I checked, the official website of RS shows that Bože pravde is the national anthem of Republika Srpska. Unless you provide strong references, I don't understand why you would change truthful facts. As far as this reference is concerned, Duja's explanation shows that this doesn't prove anything. I don't believe you're making these changes out of good faith, we should all work on bringing the people of Former Yugoslavia together, and not angering each other with these little details. I hope you understand. I wish you good editing on Wikipedia, and look forward to cooperating with you :)

All the best,

--  G OD OF  J USTICE 20:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

The RS government can say whatever they want, nobody cares.

The constitutional court has said it. Enough. Visca el barca 21:08, 6 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm sad you don't want to cooperate. :( --  G OD OF  J USTICE 05:21, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

No you dont. The truth hurt doesnt it? Visca el barca 07:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked you for 24h for edit-warring. This is independent of whether you have literally broken the three-revert rule. You have been persistently removing a well-sourced and obviously pertinent piece of information, many times over several days, against a clear consensus of all other editors on that page, for no other reasons than that you don't like the information. From your talk page, I also conclude you have shown an overall uncooperative and hostile approach to other contributors. This is unacceptable. Please learn that Wikipedia is built on consensus, and its coverage is based on verifiability; if this is what the sources say, we have to stick with it. If you find other information in other reliable sources, then by all means bring it forward after this block expires. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Editing on Wiki
Visca, I just wanted to make a couple of things clear. While I'm not disputing that there is indeed a lot of Croatian and Serbian radical nationalism on Wiki, I think you don't realise that the way to combat their distortion is not through becoming a representative of Bosnian radical nationalism, but through looking for an honestly neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not a "combat" ground or a debate club. What you should try to do is really look at things from both perspectives, and try to provide the NEUTRAL and EMOTIONLESS info. (Ne mogu ovo dovoljno da naglasim!) We do need Bosniak representation, but not to edit mindlessly and in a biased way, but to look for sources and make objective edits. DIREKTOR ( TALK ) 09:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Userboxes
Ok I gave you some template Userboxes that I thought you may approve of, and I made you a brand new "Jajce" Userbox. To make new Userboxes of your own, you can always copy-paste the writing of the "Jajce" Userbox (after clicking on edit this page, of course) and easily change the colors, text, and image (as well as the image pixel size). The colors are the #****** codes (example: #006400) you will see in the "Jajce" Userbox. The colors are written in X11 names wich you can find on the Web colors article (here ), while one is written in plane words (DarkGreen). Change them by simply replacing the codes with the codes of the colors you want. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask. DIREKTOR ( TALK ) 10:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

thanks!

However that is too complicated for me, I have no ideas how to make userboxes and all those letters just make it worse. Visca el barca 18:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Suit yourself, the only error you made was a slight deletion at the end of the script. As far as I'm concerned, I'm afraid I'll never understand fanatical religions, and while I really don't like what the Americans and Israelites are doing to Muslims, I think they'd all be a lot better off without Islam (or any other religion), no offence. Anyway, I fixed up what I could, salaam aleikum... DIREKTOR ( TALK ) 15:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Userpage
Due to the very inflammatory nature of the userboxes on your userpage, your userpage has been blanked. - NeutralHomer  T:C 13:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I have deleted your userpage; my rationale is in the deletion summary. Please keep its content within the bounds of propriety and policy, or you may find yourself blocked again. ~ Riana ⁂ 13:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Upon consideration, I have blocked your account indefinitely due to your ongoing pattern of edit warring, POV pushing, coupled with the userpage and your previous block, which does not appear to have changed your attitude very much at all. You may appeal this block via the usual venues. ~ Riana ⁂ 13:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)