User talk:Viselii-malochnik

Welcome!
Hello, Viselii-malochnik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Thomas.W talk 12:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pethmakhama, Budgam, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Thomas.W talk 12:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aley Pechkuros
Hello Viselii-malochnik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alex Pechkurov for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alex Pechkurov
Hello Viselii-malochnik,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alex Pechkurov for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aley Pechkurow


A tag has been placed on Alex Pechkurov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Thomas.W talk 13:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Alex Pechkurov, you may be blocked from editing. Thomas.W talk 13:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Alex Pechkurov. Thomas.W talk 13:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 14:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your repeated removal of the speedy deletion tag on Alex Pechkurov
Hello. The article you created is, per Wikipedia's rules, about a non-notable individual, and repeatedly removing the speedy deletion tag doesn't make that person more notable, i.e. save the article. So you might as well stop removing it. Thomas.W talk 14:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
McGeddon (talk) 14:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)