User talk:Vishal.love

Edits at Sambhaji
Thanks for your offering another interpretation of Sambhaji's behaviour. However, I have removed it because you have not provided WP:Sourcing for this claim. In contrast, the allegations of Sambhaji's misbehavior have a clear footnote (the small blue number you can click to see the source) pointing to a book where a professional historian brought up the issue. If you have a citation to a book where a historian presents another theory about Sambhaji's behaviour, or theory that he was unfairly accused for political reasons (for example) or defamed in later history, we can add that information to the article with proper footnote. Note, we won't delete the other theory since it's still a valid historical perspective, but we can provide a competing perspective so the reader knows there are different theories. How does that sound? MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:06, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Again, your edits did not provide any sourcing and so have been reverted. Please see WP:Referencing for beginners for how to do proper footnoting in order to provide evidence of a claim. And regardless of whether you find sourcing, we can add to the current theories but we will not remove the allegations of misbehaviour unless they have been shown by modern academics to be erroneous history. MatthewVanitas (talk) 12:22, 27 June 2013 (UTC)