User talk:VishanNinjamag

September 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Creation–evolution controversy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:06, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Creation–evolution controversy was changed by VishanNinjamag (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912364 on 2018-09-06T12:06:08+00:00

Welcome!
Hi VishanNinjamag! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Jorm (talk) 05:20, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

DS Alerts
Jorm (talk) 05:20, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Men Going Their Own Way. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jorm (talk) 05:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Earlier vandalism or bad edits
At Rejection of evolution by religious groups you changed the text of a sourced edit so instead of saying "rising " it said "falling" dramtically. That's obvious vandalism.

[Rejection of evolution by religious groups Here]] you added original research which is against policy when you wrote "This, when compared to the Christian Holy Bible, the Quran provides an amalgamated story of three of the original Hebrew stories: Tower of Babel, The Exodus, The Book of Esther. Ergo, the Quran is questionable about it's authenticity of the plot."

Here] you appear to have added copyright material. I think there are others but I'm out of time. Doug Weller talk 15:33, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 15:33, 14 November 2021 (UTC)