User talk:Vishnu123

Vishnu123,

I would like to open up a discussion with you. Below, I have copied from Wikipedia the first recommended step towards resolving editing differences.

I do request that you would take the time to communicate directly with me. It is important that this site remains factually accurate.

I would like to open up a discussion with you. Would you prefer to have the discussion on your user talk page, the discussion page of the article (this page), or would you prefer to have it on my user talk page?

I have copied below from Wikipedia the first recommended step towards resolving editing differences, and would like to discuss with you.

Thank you for your reply to this quick note. I do ask that you would communicate with me please.

Sincerely,

Steve Ross

Stevejross 15:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

First Step Recommended from article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Resolving_disputes

First step: Talk to the other parties involved

The first resort in resolving almost any conflict is to discuss the issue on a talk page, you may even post the proposed content on the talk page. Either contact the other party on that user's talk page, or use the talk page associated with the article in question. Never carry on a dispute on the article page itself. When discussing an issue, stay cool and do not mount personal attacks. Take the other person's perspective into account and try to reach a compromise. Assume that the other person is acting in good faith unless you have clear evidence to the contrary.

Both at this stage and throughout the dispute resolution process, talking to other parties is not simply a formality to be satisfied before moving on to the next forum. Failure to pursue discussion in good faith shows that you are trying to escalate the dispute instead of resolving it. This will make people less sympathetic to your position and may prevent you from effectively using later stages in dispute resolution. In contrast, sustained discussion and serious negotiation between the parties, even if not immediately successful, shows that you are interested in finding a solution that fits within Wikipedia policies.

Sockpuppet warning
Hello Vishnu123. Your edits have a great deal in common with those of Chella123. Please see WP:SOCK for an explanation of our policy on multiple accounts. Misuse of such accounts is taken very seriously. If you choose to edit here, you are expected to comply with Wikipedia policies. Thank you. EdJohnston 03:23, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Bearian 13:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)