User talk:Vision3001

I apologize for my confusion. A better wording of the text by the hyperlink is ".... maintained by the Singapore Government", or something of that sort - the word "FREE" in your first edit is very typical of Wikipedia spammers. Happy editing! –-  kungming·  2 | (Talk ·Contact) 05:55, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

No worries. I'll keep your kind comment in mind. Thanks. Vision3001 08:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Page Creation
Hi there. Are you creating pages for each person who died on September 11? -203.219.227.6 12:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC)


 * My wife & I just watched United 93 (film) and were most touched by those who lost their lives in that flight. Thus, I did some linking to the victims of that flight between (1) Wikipedia, (2) http://sep11memories.org/wiki/Tributes_to_individuals and (3) IMDB. Try to watch the movie if you have the chance, it's rated 7.9/10 in IMDB. United 93 (Movie) @ IMDB God bless their souls. Vision3001 13:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Dhammavadaka Sutra
What exactly is Dhammavadaka Sutra? It seems to be taken directly from. Before it can be copied to Wikisource, it needs author/translator information. Thank you. --Benn Newman 19:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

External links = link spam?
I checked out your link added to Foreign exchange market which is constantly bombarded by linkspammers. The linked papers were interesting looking, but certainly not central to the topic. I do want to keep linkspam down on that article, so I might remove it tomorrow. Any thoughts? Smallbones 19:50, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Response: Thanks for the message. Traders in Forex are constantly looking out for methods to boost their trading performance, therefore, the selected publications will help to educate them to some extent. However, if you feel that the bulk of the visitors to that page are non-traders, then I guess the link is probably of little value to them. I leave the final call to you.

Speedy deletion of Thomson data analyzer
A tag has been placed on Thomson data analyzer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dethme0w (talk) 06:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lauren Grandcolas
I have nominated Lauren Grandcolas, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Lauren Grandcolas&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? VegitaU (talk) 19:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 16:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thomson Data Analyzer


The article Thomson Data Analyzer has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article clearly fails WP:PRODUCT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)