User talk:VisitorTalk

RfF
Thank you for your comments regarding the History of the relationship... article in Requests for Feedback. Ante lan  talk  14:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Harry and the Potters
Thank you for your review of Harry and the Potters. I've made revisions based on your - very helpful- remarks. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 03:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Roy Masters, radio commentator
I read your revised biography. Thank you for a much improved article. It reads smoothly, without jarring snide comments. The section groups are fine although it seems that some points of his message are still missing. Larry R. Holmgren 15:15, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, feel free to elucidate us about Roy's general message, the theses of his books, and his many psychological insights. I tried to relate some in quotations but they were deleted.Larry R. Holmgren 22:45, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Talkpage
It's generally frowned upon to erase things from the talk pages. If they get old and stale, they should be archived. DurinsBane87 07:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining. VisitorTalk 07:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Re:Adam Clayton
You're very welcome. If you didn't notice before, 90% of the article was ripped from another website's biography of him. Don't worry, it's not a copyvio anymore, I figured I might as well fix it. Cheers, Ne ra n e i   (talk) 14:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

3o on Talk:WCDB
Hi! I was reviewing 3o at the same time you were, and also visited the WCDB page. It seems the user who requested a comment was asking for an opinion on the tone of the anonymous IP's comment about his grammar usage. I'll be leaving a message for the user who posted the 3o request advising him that such things are better intended for WQA or by talking to the editor himself. :) --User: (talk) 16:37, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

RFC on Herbert W. Armstrong
More opinions are always welcome, but I'm not sure I can summarize the dispute concisely -- especially not at 5 in the morning. :) We've opened up an RFC/U over Requests for comment/Jebbrady: that's about as concise as I can get it, and it doesn't even cover the most contentious time....--SarekOfVulcan 09:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Feel free to take till 6 in the evening if you need to make your summary, I'm patient. :-) VisitorTalk 05:45, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

James Kilfedder
It's gone quiet. See what happens. If necessary, follow WP:DISPUTE, or report to WP:BLPN. Tyrenius 09:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the information. VisitorTalk 03:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Heavy_metal_umlaut
I answered your question. on the Heavy Metal Umlaut talk page. and please tell me you weren't just joking about that.  Connör ( talk ) 10:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I responded on your user talk page. VisitorTalk 03:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, lol, well I wasnt sure because there was actually someone else who seriously thought it was spelled ümlaut.  Connör ( talk ) 12:46, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Lack of infos

 * Hello Visitor,

I read yr third opinion on Telebras. If you pls have a look at my comments. Maybe you will change yr mind. I think there are several infos missing, such as post-privatization facts or before-privatization facts. Ludovicapipa yes? 11:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Your Sept. 6 list of questions seems appropriate to me and I see that you added that information to the article. Your comments to the other users about a Faucher reference don't seem to me to show an assumption of good will, only mocking disregard for the other editors.  It would be courteous of you to remove that mocking tone, and make an informational comment only in a polite manner. VisitorTalk 03:27, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Plano Collor

 * Hello again, Visitor:
 * Don´t you think political matters are TOO emphasized here? The article is abt and economic plan. All references to its economic policies were deleted by the user. And wihtout ask, discuss nor justify, he requested a page protection.
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plano_Collor Ludovicapipa yes? 12:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Gold as an Investment
Hey there,

I made an additional to Gold as an investment. Let me know what you think. Prestonp 06:20, 29 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I commented on that article's talk page. Thanks for the heads up about your change. VisitorTalk 07:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Just FYI I added a reference to the sentence you were questioning. Prestonp 05:13, 2 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, with the archiving of that page's Talk section I'm not clear on just what you changed. Can you please point out your new material? VisitorTalk 03:33, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Telebrás and Ludovicapipa
Visitor, I just saw your comment on that page, and just as a heads-up Ludovica already has a Request for Comment/User Conduct in progress. If you feel that her conduct at Talk:Telebrás is consistent with the issues brought up on the RfC, please endorse or comment on it. This user has already been blocked for one year at the PT wikipedia for the same offenses and we're trying to get as much input on the situation as possible before deciding what to do next.--Dali-Llama 03:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I responded on your user talk page. VisitorTalk 03:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * And it was a perfectly reasonable response. Thanks!--Dali-Llama 03:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

RFCecon
Thanks for pointing that out. Someone just edited the template to spam their website. The bot would've steamrolled over that spam, but nonetheless I decided to revert. MessedRocker (talk) 03:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

The Edge
Hey, I noticed your point on the page about Edge's nickname, and I wanted to discuss it with you. I think that "Edge" is a more fan-club thing, and less formal and encyclopedic in tone than using "The Edge". However, before changing anything, as you were the one who brought it up, I wanted to ask you. Love, Ne ra n e i   (talk) 20:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't really have a preference, I just want to see the article by consistent. If you feel the "the" is more encyclopedic, go for it! VisitorTalk 00:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks! I just wanted to check with you so we didn't have a war on out hands :). Love, Ne ra n e i   (talk) 01:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

On behalf of User:Trbochrgr
I was recently dealing with multiple WP:BLP violations by this user and came upon this (diff). Does it mean that (s)he has no idea what signatures are for and impersonates you just by accident? My good faith is failing here. I would like to hand this over to you, in order to avoid "stalking" or "nitpicking" a particular editor (his talk page already has enough user warnings of mine). --saimhe 13:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Request for Comment
Based on your comments here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Avoiding_harm, I am interested in having your feedback/criticism dialogue here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Guideline_for_crime_victims_of_world_wide_significanceMeropeRiddle (talk) 10:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)