User talk:Visor87

Heritage
It's just a thought, but I have concerns about this heritage thing. Take Emerson Fittipaldi: His paternal grandfather was Italian. His paternal grandmother may therefore have been Italian, but she may not. His maternal grandmother was Russian, and therefore his maternal grandfather may have been the same. His mother was born in Poland. His father was born in Brazil. As Emerson himself has put it: "My father only has a little Italian blood". So to my knowledge Fittipaldi has Russian, Italian and Polish heritage in addition to his Brazilian nationality. Given Brazil's history (Native Indians, Imported African slaves and Portuguese colonists) 'Brazilian' likely includes other elements as well - why is Italian the most important one, and why is it important enough to put in the lead, ahead of any of the others? Happy to discuss. 4u1e 15:19, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * No, but he also has Russian, Polish (both definitely) and very probably Portuguese origins. So why mention only Italian, and why in the lead (see WP:LEAD), which should be a summary of the most important bits? It's helpful if you sign your posts by putting 4 tildes ( ~ ) after your posts, by the way. ;-) 4u1e 15:29, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I know some people find names important, but they don't represent 'heritage' particularly strongly, and even if they did, you'd only be looking at as little as 1/4 of the man's actual 'heritage'. I have to admit I find the general obsession with tracing only the male side of a family fairly puzzling. It's as likely that a sportsman's particular attributes come from his mother as his father, after all! Anyway, happy editing. 4u1e 14:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Page move
Hi there Visor87, just a quick note to let you know the page you created at Return To The The Lost World (1992 film) is now located at Return to the Lost World after the original page was moved to conform with our naming conventions. The redirect (NOT the article) has been listed for deletion at Redirects for discussion if you wish to contribute to the discussion. Thanks, mattbr 19:41, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Edward D. Malone
An article that you have been involved in editing, Edward D. Malone, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. Arch dude 14:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Olek Krupa
A tag has been placed on Olek Krupa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 22:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Derek “Rocco” Barnabei
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Derek “Rocco” Barnabei, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Derek “Rocco” Barnabei. andy (talk) 00:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Harper Carter
A tag has been placed on Harper Carter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. CalendarWatcher (talk) 13:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alfredo Rampi


The article Alfredo Rampi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non notable event

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stormbay (talk) 18:54, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Visor87! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Alberto Angela -
 * 2) Christian De Sica -
 * 3) Massimo Boldi -

Lyndon B. Johnson
Hi. Do you have a source to support this change? In the meantime, I've changed it back (and qualified it with the adjective "near"). Rivertorch (talk) 17:24, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edoardo Stoppa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sarai and LA7. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Avoid copy-and-paste articles
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Parco della Preistoria di Rivolta d'Adda a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:07, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Panacea De' Muzzi
Hello Visor87,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Panacea De' Muzzi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Dr Strauss  talk  10:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Roderick Chisholm (engineer)
Hi, I'm Cwmhiraeth. Visor87, thanks for creating Roderick Chisholm (engineer)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add some citations to this useful article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:23, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Artigiano in Fiera moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Artigiano in Fiera, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  20:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Artigiano in Fiera moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Artigiano in Fiera, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  17:52, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Artigiano in Fiera
Hello, Visor87. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Artigiano in Fiera, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Artigiano in Fiera


Hello, Visor87. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Artigiano in Fiera".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:15, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Saor Patrol


The article Saor Patrol has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unreferenced. Can find no indication they fulfil WP:BAND."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mutt Lunker (talk) 20:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)