User talk:Vista Valkyrie

Private contact information...
...should not be posted at W. David notMD (talk) 04:47, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I would agree with that. Your user page is visible to just about anyone on the internet, so you should be judicious about what information you give out. Primefac (talk) 15:33, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Vista Valkyrie, stop. We don't know who you are. We don't know who that address belongs to. We don't know whether you are a minor. This is your last warning to desist. There will not be another. Thanks and good luck. El_C 16:59, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Indefinite block
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 17:03, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Just wondering, how long will it take before a decision is made on this block request? I do realize this is a busy time of year for a lot of people but I was just curious. Thanks! Vista Valkyrie (talk) 23:58, 24 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Who knows how long before a decision is made, Vista Valkyrie? The decision will not be in your favor, but it will benefit both you and Wikipedia by keeping the two of you apart, so stop holding your breath. Thus far, you have annoyed several senior editors by wasting their time frivolously, and wasted your own time as well. Your first waste of time comes from the fact that Wikipedia is not social media, which is how you have treated it in some instances. The second reason you are wasting your time is that you think you are competent to copyedit articles for syntax and punctuation. This is a false assumption. Your copyedits have all been reverted, with one or two exceptions. When your edit does not improve how the article reads and is understood, but only matches the way you write or think you should write, it is a bad edit and gets reverted with a couple of clicks, or manually in some cases (which I hate having to do.)


 * Your behavior shows us that you're incapable or unwilling to cooperate in a team environment, which is what Wikipedia is: a massive international project. In fact, I assume by your attitude that you are . You may be unblocked eventually, but you can expect, at best, the Standard offer: understand what you have done in the context of Wikipedia and how it differs from what you ought to have done; stating plans for your future editing intentions and, if it has been 6 months since your block, you will perhaps be let back in. Do note that, in egregious cases, you may be told to stay away, blocked, for a year or more, until you "grow up".


 * In the meantime, if you do intend to toil in anonymity to improve Wikipedia, I'm going to put some helpful links to vital policies, rules and suggestions around Wikipedia editing right on this page, below this post. Good luck in reading and understanding them and everything they link to. Should be a nice long read, one hour per night for 6 months, until you (hopefully) get unblocked.--Quisqualis (talk) 01:18, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , please don't make assumptions like that; and if you do, please don't post your speculations here. Primefac (talk) 20:20, 25 December 2020 (UTC)