User talk:Visualpleasure

Chronological order, when commenting/discussing on a talk page
You recently wedged a discussion in the talk page of User:Fastily, in a discussion that was already in progress for three days. You need to add your discussion in chronologial order on a talk page. Otherwise your discussion might go unnoticed, and will also create confusion in the other discussions. Thank you, Nelsondenis248 (talk) 01:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark von Schlegell
Hello Visualpleasure,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mark von Schlegell for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Itsalleasy (talk) 03:05, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

November 2016
Your recent editing history at Stephen Bannon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 05:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Stephen Bannon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 05:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 05:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice - American politics, BLP
-- slakr \ talk / 09:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC) -- slakr \ talk / 09:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, I'm Andrzejbanas. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)