User talk:VitLosenicky

Comparison of EM simulation software
I have removed your removal proposal, as I do not think that it is a genuine proposal. Especially as you seem to have created your account specifically for this occasion.

The essence of Comparison of EM simulation software is that it states notable programs in this field. Not as many as possible. Part of the decision to limit the article to notable programs - defined as having their own separate article - is to stop and curb extensive spamming.

So if you want to add a program: write the article first. First write an article in draft-space, get it approved and place in main space and only then add the program to this list.

It has nothing to do with censorshop as you between the lines suggested but with a discussed and approved line of action. The Banner talk 09:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Let's start from the beginning. I have edited several wiki pages, but it seems that in this specific case is important to act as a registered user.


 * I don't know how much you are oriented in the area od EM simulation software, however, the "The essence of Comparison of EM simulation software is that it states notable programs in this field." can not be satisfied, while software which covers a big part of the market is missing (CST Suite Studio, link), as well as you can find on the internet several private lists of software, which is more than five times more comprehensive (see link).


 * I think so anyway that this site should provide a wide portfolio of tools, not necessarily commercial, which can be used for a plethora of different uses. It could be not only standalone applications but also modules for MATLAB, python and other stuff used by both engineers and researchers.


 * The last thing what I do not understand is your argument with missing articles. There are several pages in different science fields where exist similar lists (see link1, link2, ...] where the existence of separate articles is not required. Additionally while the advertisement on Wikipedia is forbidden.
 * --VitLosenicky (talk) 10:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Other stuff exists. And the article begins with "The following table list notable software packages that are nominal EM (electromagnetic) simulators; ". If a program/package does not have its own article, by wiki-standards it is deemed to be not notable. It is nice that you want to have "CST Studio Suite" in the article, nothing wrong with that. But write a separate article about it, backed up by independent sources. Only then can it be added to the article. The Banner  talk 11:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The "CST Studio Suite" is just an example of software which is definitely notable. There is, of course, a bunch of other that are missing, e.g. WIPL-D, AWR, ... Can you show me the rule, that only stuff with own article is notable? Notability If I'm right, there is no rule to have its own article, while there are the third party sources.


 * I do not want to have a long unnecessarily discussion, however, in my opinion, the article could provide far more valuable information.
 * --VitLosenicky (talk) 12:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Then write the articles. The Banner  talk 12:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:WIPL-D
My advice for Draft:WIPL-D is to add independent sources to the article. Related sources, like the own (company)website are not sufficient to establish notability. Good luck with the draft! The Banner talk 13:07, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. This is the initial release to place the Draft into the queue. I will continue in editing.
 * --VitLosenicky (talk) 13:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: WIPL-D (September 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by WikiDan61 were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WIPL-D and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:WIPL-D, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:WIPL-D Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WikiDan61&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:WIPL-D reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello VitLosenicky, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Draft:WIPL-D have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MER-C 18:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)