User talk:VitaliiV

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Ritchie333  (talk)  (cont)   00:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your email. I've looked through the sources, and I don't think I can accept either, because the former is published by the organisation, while the latter is just a basic file extension description. What we require is coverage in multiple independent sources, such as news outlets with a track record of editorial control and impartiality. I've seen cNet and TechCrunch used as suitable sources in the past. Our articles on PokerTracker and Norton Internet Security might give you some ideas of what sources are acceptable, as they are both good articles that have undergone a thorough peer review to establish editorial quality.

A tangential question relating to this is - what are you hoping to achieve by using Wikipedia? If your answer is along the lines of "to promote awareness of my product", you're likely to be disappointed, I'm afraid, as many editors frown on people creating articles about their own companies and products. The other thing to bear in mind is that an article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing, as Wikipedia will pick up the good and the bad about your product, and if extensive criticism of it appears in the news, it's fair game for us to write about it. So it's not necessarily a bad thing to not have an article.

I hope this addresses some of your concerns. If not, please let me know. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)   16:28, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/VSD Viewer concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/VSD Viewer, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/VSD Viewer


Hello VitaliiV. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "VSD Viewer".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)