User talk:VitalyScientist

October 2018
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Abc conjecture. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 21:28, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

It was a misprint because in English there is no double negate: not ... not

3RR rule
In case you did not know there is a rule about edit wars that you violated twice in the last 24 hours : Edit_warring. It seems to me that it would be counterproductive to report that now so I will not do it, but I will revert your edit soon and if you insist on continuing this behavior it will be reported.

The various reasons for our reverts was explained very clearly in the edit summaries by. Your are in the minority here so you should start a discussion on the talk page about the merits of you proposed edits if you want to push them through. Cheers, jraimbau (talk) 11:03, 17 May 2019 (UTC)