User talk:Vitasmortis

Please refrain from blanking your Talk page, it's against Wikipedia policy. There is no reason to hide something when you have nothing to hide.

From your contributions so far, you might have a conflict of interest. In case you are affiliated with Mystery, Venusian Arts, or any other organization or persons affiliated with them, you might be line stepping. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy edits where there is a conflict of interest are strongly discouraged. Pay attention to editing related to your and your affiliations, participating in deletion discussions, linking to other Wikipedia articles of your organization. Avoid ignoring relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography. These are cornerstone policies that must be adhered at all times to safeguard Wikipedia's authenticity and interests.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. Xandrus (talk) 02:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

My bad. I just figured that since I had corrected the problem with the picture (see the history), there was no reason to keep it up there. As for the conflict of interest thing? I just asked the site admin if I could use the pics when I fixed up the article. Vitasmortis (talk) 18:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest
I was assuming good faith at first wp:agf, but it's pretty clear that your edits on Wikipedia appear to all share the goal of driving traffic to the website www.Venusianarts.com and the promotion of products and services available there. I can sympathize with your desire to ensure that you (or your employer) is fairly represented on wikipedia, but:

1) You must, according to wikipedia policies, declare your conflict of interest. You have repeatedly answered requests to do this with "but other guys are doing it too".  While that may or may not be true (and I will happily assist you if so), that does not change your responsibility to declare your conflict of interest

2) Erik von Markovik is a famous and controversial person, and many people have edited the pages you are interested in (Mystery, Mystery Method, etc.) and will continue to do so. Generally, the expectation is that content will be added for famous people through neutral point of view edits as opposed to promotion directly from that person's commercial organization.

Please also be aware of wikipedia policies on Sock Puppets - I've noticed at least two accounts that starting editing when you did and have a similar agenda and writing style. I will assume good faith here, but if you operate or are considering operating more than one account or is Venusian Arts Corporation is operating more than one account, this also violates wikipedia policies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.98.1.215 (talk) 02:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Seduction
Hi, I'd like to invite you to join WikiProject Seduction! Just add the page to your watchlist for any news, and contribute to the articles :) Mathmo Talk 06:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:VA revelationcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:VA revelationcover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:VA mmcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:VA mmcover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:26, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:VA matador.gif
Thanks for uploading File:VA matador.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:27, 26 May 2011 (UTC)