User talk:Vittalio

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Vittalio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 10:25, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

July 2014
Hello, I'm Cowlibob. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Igor Girkin because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Cowlibob (talk) 09:08, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Myr vashomy domy!


The article Myr vashomy domy! has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "delete as not meeting WP:NFILM tagged as needing more sources since April 2017 none added."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:39, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Myr vashomy domy! for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Myr vashomy domy! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Myr vashomy domy! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 01:25, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kukhareva London


A tag has been placed on Kukhareva London, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 11:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Kukhareva London for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kukhareva London is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kukhareva London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 08:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Comment Kukhareva London
I haven't posted here before because you are not a new editor, but I see that you have recreated clearly promotion article. I deleted your article because
 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. Much of your text is unsourced.
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. The company appears to have no employees, profits or turnover, all you tell us is what it sells

'' Since you have recreated a promo and appear to be repeating its claims as if they were real facts, and not giving any company information beyond what they sell, I have to ask if you have an undeclared conflict of interest. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Vittalio. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block.
 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. Examples of obvious opinions or outright spam include most notable for its tops and evening dresses... Each collection is inspired and based around a specific set of patterns... At Kukhareva believe in giving back and regularly support charities... The ecology issues are important for Kukhareva... Its products are available for purchase online and via selected offline retailers

Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Jim!

Thank you for your message.

Here are the arguments to explain the things:

1. The brand in fact is famous enough in the fashion industry, so these independent verifiable world famous sources like Vogue, Daily Mail and The Telegraph write about it. Moreover, big fashion sources are provided as well:


 * The brand website
 * The Guardian. Five fashion designers working sustainably without the eco terminology
 * Vogue. London Fashion Week
 * Daily Mail. Watch your step! Model wearing wacky sky-high platform shoes takes a tumble in embarrassing London Fashion Week finale
 * Italianist. Ekaterina Kukhareva
 * The Telegraph. Why is the 1950s housewife making a comeback?
 * Gemologue. GEM TALK WITH EKATERINA KUKHAREVA
 * Fajo Magazine. How yarn turns into Tsaritsa-style knits
 * Dreaming Of. A well knitted fashion story: interview with a designer Ekaterina Kukhareva
 * References in Ukrainain and Russian can be provided as well.

The thing is that the news sites like the Guardian mostly do not write about fashion. For that purpose there are a lot of fashion specialised sites that can be unknown for the people not connected with fashion.


 * Note that the brand website and the Daily Mail are not viewed as reliable sources. The first shouldn't be used for anything that might be challenged, the newspaper shouldn't be used. Also, several of your sources appear to be interviews with the designer, again not suitable as independent third-party sources, although it explains why your text reads so promotionally, it's here talking about her own brans Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Daily Mail is deleted from the link list.--Vittalio (talk) 20:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

2. It's a private company that does not have to disclose revenues. Only public companies do. If this financial info is important for you, I can state it.
 * I can't see why, say, number of staff is confidential? Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * As it is possible due to the UK laws for the private companies not to disclose some certain info, I have stated in the company description sentence that it is private.--Vittalio (talk) 20:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

3. Non-promotional tone. I don't mind to change the sentances that you stated. It is easy to do. I will do that as soon as the page is back.
 * OK, but you've not done so so far Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Edited. Now it looks neutral I guess. --Vittalio (talk) 20:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

4. I do NOT get a reward or any compensation for ANY article created. In the Ukrainian and Russian Wikipedia I have more than 2600 articles created. I am the Wikipedia user since 2009. My fashion she-friend from Ukraine (Olenka) asked if I can create an article for her British-Ukrainian friend (Ekaterina). I believe in friendship, I love art, I like the style that Ekaterina creates and I want the company of my friend's friend to have information at Wikipedia. And it is for free as it is to support the friendship. Spiritual is more important than material.
 * Fine, you don't have to declare a paid interest, but you must not let your friendship lead you into writing a promo instead of a factual article Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

5. I can see a lot of articles in the category https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Clothing_brands_of_the_United_Kingdom that look like a stub, are really promotional and short, but nobody deletes them.


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tata_Naka
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merchant_Archive
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thornback_%26_Peel
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tricouni_(brand)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weird_Fish
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henleys
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammond_%26_Co.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton_Umbrellas
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firetrap
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finery_(company)

Please advise how my article should look like any of these so it is not deleted anymore?


 * Not sure what the relevance of those links is. The fact that other articles have not been deleted doesn't help you, either they met the criteria or should be deleted as well. See What about article x?. Also note that many articles would have been accepted before the notability guidelines were made stricter. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Got it. Writing this article I paid attention to the mentioned ones, that's why I though their content structure and sentences can be applicable for the article of the same category. --Vittalio (talk) 20:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

6. In addition, are these Wikipedia rules Deletion is not cleanup and Wikipedia is a work in progress still in use?
 * Firstly, you are presenting us with a finished article, not a draft, so it will be judged as it stands. Wikipedia is a work in progress in that there is never a final version. And G11 is there to prevent spamming, so an article will not be allowed to survive if it's written as a promo Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Waiting for your comments, Jim! Thank you!--Vittalio (talk) 08:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)


 * I've interleaved my replies with yours, I hope that's OK <b style="font-family:Lucida;color:red">Jimfbleak</b> - talk to me?  10:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for the explanation! I appreciate it a lot in fact! :) --Vittalio (talk) 20:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Epom


A tag has been placed on Epom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Blablubbs | talk 11:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello. Thank you for the message. If the article seems promotional, let's delete the part that is not corresponding to the Wiki rules? Please advise. Thank you!--Vittalio (talk) 11:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)