User talk:VivaEspana11

Warning for Van Fortress
Please do not revert edits like [this one] without providing a proper reason. If you continue this behavior, you might be reported to a Wikipedia noticeboard. Sincerely, BaxçeyêReş (talk) 23:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Warning for Gədəbəy
I have warned you once, and I will do so again: Do not conduct edits like [this], erasing sourced information while providing none for your claims. If one more of your edits is disruptive, I will report you to WP:ANI for WP:NOTTHERE and WP:VANDALISM. BaxçeyêReş (talk) 16:26, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Dzveli Kveshi
Please, stop pushing other name on "Dzveli Kveshi" as if it is more important or equally used like "Dzveli Kveshi" (when you make it bold, that must have a ground). Simple Google search shows that the name 'Zol-Goyach' is used almost nowhere, except on wiki or its mirror pages (and in total 165 cases). While name "Dzveli Kveshi" is used officially and Google search shows 14,300 results. Also, I don't see any reliable source which would indicate that the name 'Zol-Goyach' azerbaijani name, provide sources. -- Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ   ★  12:16, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Kevo3 2 7 (talk) 19:18, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Firstly, please check the talk page of Aşağı Ağcakənd. This wikipedia is not an Armenian wikipedia. VivaEspana11 (talk page) 19:20, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
- Kevo3 2 7 (talk) 21:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Your recent editing history at Aşağı Ağcakənd shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - K<b style="color:#000000">evo</b><sup style="color:#d90012">3 <sup style="color:#0033a0">2 <sup style="color:#f2a800">7 (talk) 09:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:EljanM&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/EljanM. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:40, 3 July 2021 (UTC)