User talk:Vivabusmarkham

Please take a look at this sentence
Please take a look at this sentence from the perspective of someone who is not thinking what you are thinking, i.e., other readers:
 * Viva Green is primarily a 40ft route and uses VanHool A330.

Viva Green is very obviously not a 40-foot route. It is very much longer than that. After all, the article states up front that the route runs from at Don Mills subway station in North York and McCowan Road in Markham, which is about 20 km or so, according to Google maps.

Do you expect all other readers to know what a VanHool A330 is? I am sure you know, and I can guess from the context, but you shouldn't be making your readers guess what you mean. You should write clearly enough so that people who aren't you understand what you are writing.

Here is a good resource to help you write better articles: Writing_better_articles Regards, Ground Zero | t 03:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Viva Green is a 40ft route. --Vivabusmarkham (talk) 04:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * There are two things wrong with every edit you make. One, if the route is 40ft, I would walk that. Two, the length of the bus is longer than the route itself. Hum1969, 911plantisimo, Vivabusmarkham, whatever you are right now. Stop your disruptive editing. Alexhead8835 (talk) 14:46, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The reason he is writing this is because he's copying it off the CPTDB website like usual:http://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php?title=York_Region_Transit_route_606_%27Viva_Green%27 I will be reverting his edits, you can't use a Wiki page to source information, I've already told you this when you were using account "Hum1969." Alexhead8835 (talk) 14:48, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Alexhead8835 SHUT UP AND LEAVE ME ALONE >:( --Vivabusmarkham (talk) 14:57, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

READ THIS
EVERYBODY YOU NEED TO SHUT THE F**** UP AND LEAVE MY TALK PAGE ALONE unsigned by User:Vivabusmarkham


 * Dude, Wikipedia is a collaborative project, so you will not be left alone to write whatever you want. Other people are going to edit or remove your work. That is how Wikipedia works, and why it has policies and guidelines to help people work together. People here, including me, are offering you advice and information so that your edits are not reverted and you don't end up getting blocked. Making a bunch of edits that get reverted, as you are doing, is a waste of your time. We're trying to help you become a constructive editor. Ground Zero | t 03:35, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Vivabusmarkham


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Vivabusmarkham, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Randor1980 (talk | contributions) 15:07, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. — Cactus Writer (talk) 15:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)