User talk:Vivektou

Copyvio warning
Your addition to criticism of Muhammad has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:23, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Be aware also that even if rewritten in your own words, we generally cannot cite self-published material from blogs or personal websites with vanity domains, as this was. The exception would be if the author is a recognized expert (recognized as in "cited by other scholars") on the subject he is writing about, but I see no evidence of that here. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:29, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

User: Anachronist, Ok. Thanks. Maybe I need to find better sources and content. Can you help? Vivektou (talk) 19:36, 4 February 2019 (UTC)