User talk:Viybel~enwiki

Welcome!
Hello Viybel and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Talk:OWASP, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Widefox ; talk 11:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

June 2013
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:OWASP ‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. I do not know why it is blacklisted - you should take that up in the appropriate place, instead of posting the url here to circumvent the blacklist, which would never be justified. Widefox ; talk 11:17, 18 June 2013 (UTC) I asked a question in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:OWASP (read it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AOWASP&diff=523681550&oldid=515811278) about why a website is blacklisted and you're accusing me of spamming Wikipedia??? From what I remember (it was 8 months ago), I found a page on a website useful and I was just curious to know what rules were involved in blacklisting it. I could not care less wether or not this link is on Wikipedia, I don't know anything about the site and I'm just vaguely interested in the subject. But I found your message on my page particularly aggressive. I suppose it is a template message for spammers. You should either rephrase it so that non-spammers don't find it insulting, or use another message for cases where the user deserves the benefit of the doubt. I hope this behavior does not reflect the whole Wikipedia community's tone. Vianney — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.207.108.166 (talk) 11:40, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Vianney, I'm sorry you are offended. As you knowingly posted a url that was blacklisted so that others could follow it, I did not assume good faith as the effect is to evade the blacklist. OK, I take it back above. Will you undo your two edits to that talk page to remove it?
 * As it happens, I don't know why its WP:blacklisted either. I can, however, see there's a some WP:COI, WP:SPA promotional editing around this area that's quite aggressive (see my talk page). Sorry once again. Widefox ; talk 12:03, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Apology accepted :-) I manually removed my question from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:OWASP because my revision cannot be "undone". Feel free to remove my message from your page.
 * If you'd like to remove or strikethrough your comment(s) you're free to. BTW anyone is free to remove from their own page, although archiving is deemed better. To answer your original question, it was blacklisted years ago as it was considered a sales site, you can search for info in the archive. Widefox ; talk 15:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Viybel. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Viybel~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 03:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)