User talk:Viznut

Welcome
y0 viznut &mdash; welcome to the en version of wikipedia. ;) &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 03:26, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

Commodore Wikipedians needed
Hey Viz, thought you might wanna check this out! ;-) DeeKay64 (talk) 09:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Amiga demos category change
Hey there.. I noticed you moved Amiga demos from Category:Demoscene to Category:Demos. This sort of makes sense, but then it sets a precedent. If you move that, you should move Apple II gs demos, Atari demos, Commodore 64 demos, Text mode demos, and ZX Spectrum demos as well. Do we want to do that? I'm not sure. Adding terms to a category that has just titles in it now would start to blur the line between the Demos and Demoscene categories. Then, which one would we put demo effects in? --Vossanova 19:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Yep, I noticed too that the platform-specific "demos" articles were no longer in the same category but didn't realize the problem of blurring the line. Perhaps Category:Demos would make more sense if there was a subcategory Category:Amiga demos with Amiga demos as its main article. But since we don't have such a hierarchy, I decided to move the article back to Category:Demoscene. Viznut 20:43, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * OK. And yes, if we had categories like PC Demos, Amiga Demos, or even Demo Titles, it might be more clear, but it's probably safest to leave it like it is for now.  I fixed your category links, BTW. :) --Vossanova 20:49, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

PanTheist... perhaps also PanDeist?
Friend, I see that you class yourself as a PanTheist - might you also be a PanDeist? I have just begun speak on such things at length on my MySpace blog.

//// Pacific PanDeist 03:12, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Timeless (demo) Afd
The Timeless demo article has been nominated for deletion - I saved it from proposed deletion (prod). If you want to help justify its existence, please do so! Deletion page here. --Vossanova o&lt; 22:19, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

User categories for discussion on -isms
Hi. A user category that you are in has been proposed for deletion at User categories for discussion. You are welcome to comment. Cheers! bd2412 T 02:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Impulse Tracker
Hello, I'd like to discuss the section on IT clones in this article. I removed it originally because the information is not verified through reliable, third-party sources, and just seemed to be an excuse for people to list their homebrew trackers. Do you think you can address this issue? Marasmusine (talk) 15:12, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Although you asked of me "next time, please discuss first", you haven't replied to my proposed application of our WP:Verifiability policy. Therefore I will remove the problematic sections again. Marasmusine (talk) 11:09, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Byterapers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Byterapers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Byterapers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ridernyc (talk) 03:49, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Demo effect


The article Demo effect has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * An article based on original research and unreliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Λeternus (talk) 09:20, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Commodore VIC-20 demos


The article Commodore VIC-20 demos has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * An article based on original research and unreliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Λeternus (talk) 09:35, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Demomaker


The article Demomaker has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Λeternus (talk) 09:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Moppi Productions


The article Moppi Productions has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Λeternus (talk) 09:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Viznut/Deletionist attacks against demoscene articles
User:Viznut/Deletionist attacks against demoscene articles, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Viznut/Deletionist attacks against demoscene articles and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Viznut/Deletionist attacks against demoscene articles during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:03, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Wizardry (The Edge) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wizardry (The Edge) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wizardry (The Edge) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Moppi Productions for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moppi Productions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Moppi Productions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. toweli (talk) 12:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)