User talk:Vkapila/sandbox

Suggestions from ChemLibrarian
Good work! I haven't seen reviews posted by your peers. Please see my suggestions below but please note that my suggestions are not focusing the content. Hopefully, your peers will post their comments soon.

1. I fixed your link on the course page to the original article page. Just want to let you know that the link you posted didn't work because of different capitalization of the word. So, it should be RAB7A.

2. I see that you did copy the original article to the front of your article. I'd suggest you incorporate your edits into this existing part. E.g. Your background section can be incorporated into the lead section. Feel free to edit the paragraph originally exists too when you see appropriate. As long as it's a valid edit, people will not feel that you didn't respect their work, especially if you include their reference there.

3. The web page you cited http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene?Db=gene&Cmd=ShowDetailView&TermToSearch=7879, you may want to add an access date since it's a dynamic page and may change. Please also fix the reference you listed in the Function section. Also, seems like you don't have any reference for the Regulator section.

4.It would be great if you can expand the interaction section a bit more.

5. You did not have sufficient internal link to other Wikipedia articles for terms and jargon in your addition. e.g. GTPase, MITF ... Please add some internal links as you can.

Hope it helps. Please let me know if you have any questions. ChemLibrarian (talk) 17:49, 27 October 2014 (UTC)