User talk:Vkilmer02/sandbox

V - great work with all of your copy edits; those edits make the page more credible. Also, I think you are fine with leaving the reference to After School because as you mentioned it provides context. In the same sense that knowing about Friendster and MySpace helps to understand Facebook. DrTraceyHayes (talk) 06:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hi Vanessa, I'm doing your eval per Dr. H! What you have on your user page is great! I appreciate the format you setup in your user page as it's easy to follow and see your proposed changes. The Anonymous Social Media wikipedia page is pretty straightforward and the lead made sense to me. The structure of the wikipedia page makes sense as well. Great catch on not needing a Google + login anymore! I checked out your sources and those looked good. The content was as neutral as it can be, with the bullying focused in the controversy section. I noticed one "app" not mentioned; it's run through Facebook and it's called Profoundly. It's anonymous as far as you see a list of your Facebook friends who have it and you can send anonymous messages, but if you have few friends on it the anonymity is less.

Anyway, I think you made the best choices on your updates and revisions to this article.

Bstonezag (talk) 06:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)