User talk:Vl'hurg

Wil Harris
I take it that what you want is undeletion of the history? I don't have a problem with that. I have noted this at WP:DRV. Guy (Help!) 15:03, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Rollback
You want to revert an established wikipedian do not use rollback scripts. Use a proper edit summary that explains why. Rollback is only for obvious vandalism. Thanks.--Docg 14:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Net@nite.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Net@nite.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Workrave logo.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Workrave logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Net@nite, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Videmus Omnia 07:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

League of Copyeditors roll call
Melon ‑ Bot  ( STOP! )  18:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Image:96.9 VikingFM.PNG
Restored. Sorry for the delay, but I've been active only sporadically recently, and you could have approached any admin to restore it. :-) east. 718 at 05:11, February 29, 2008

Hi problem with your username
I feel your user name may be inappropriate here. it is the name of an intergalactic species which tried to attack our Galaxy. this is deliberately adopting the name of a group which is extremely controversial. the fact that they were swallowed by a small dog before attacking the G'Guvunts is of no import whatsoever, and we will expressly sue anyone who may mention it. Consider yourself forewarned. Signed, the Syrius Cybernetics Corporation.

Oh, and by the way....:-) Cool username. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 02:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

mayire pochchu
நீ பயம் புடுத்தி தடை செஞ்சா, நான் என்ன பயந்திடுவேணா? pOdaa puchikki.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.57.162 (talk) 23:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Net@night


The article Net@night has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Lack of outside or 3rd party citations and little evidence of notability. See Articles_for_deletion/This_WEEK_in_FUN for precedence on this issue.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andyzweb (talk) 15:27, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Workrave logo.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Workrave logo.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- Bloonstdfan360  / talk / contribs 00:53, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Re: Past presenters
Hi Vl'hurg, I thought you may wish to have your input in this discussion regarding Hallam FM 'past presenters' list reduction. I have logged a dispute resolution request, which can be viewed via Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard.

Thank you. Butdavid (talk) 14:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Butdavid (talk) 14:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Opera Unite listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Opera Unite. Since you had some involvement with the Opera Unite redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 80.221.159.67 (talk) 02:45, 25 October 2016 (UTC)