User talk:Vladmironovec

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Vladmironovec, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Chernobyl (miniseries) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Gam-COVID-Vac
Hello. About this: there is no source for that. What is your source? Please add and discuss it on Talk:Gam-COVID-Vac. Thanks. KurtR (talk) 19:34, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, Vladmironovec!
 * You contributed a lot of information to the article Sputnik_V_COVID-19_vaccine here, and gave a number of sources. However, I believe that you mistakenly wrote the same source twice. You quoted Stephen Griffin from Leeds, and Stephen Evans from London, and referred to exactly the same article for both. However, that article only cites one of the Stephens, namely Evans. I suspect that you intended another source for your quote of Griffin. Am I right, and could you please correct that source? Best, JoergenB (talk) 21:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hi Vladmironovec! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Russian foreign agent law that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Renat 11:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Russian foreign agent law. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Renat 17:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC) -- Renat 17:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Kacamata. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Russian bounty program have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 23:17, 26 November 2022 (UTC)