User talk:Vlado-do

Regarding edits to Oppositional defiant disorder
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Vlado-do! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bmembers\.aol\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 15:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

April 2010
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Gapless playback. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. tedder (talk) 03:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Probably you are right about the inappropriate form my comment on "banshee" had - but according to my testing it does not support Gapless playback, so either my comment should be retained, or banshee be completely removed from that list - unless someone tested it, and got a different result. But right now I don't feel like testing the latest version of Banshee again and going back to the article for that... --vlado-do