User talk:Vlavluck

Your submission at Articles for creation: Иван Монтик (April 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Иван Монтик and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Иван Монтик, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nearlyevil665&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665  18:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to SoftSwiss have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:12, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: SoftSwiss was changed by Vlavluck (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.922273 on 2021-05-07T14:12:17+00:00

Your submission at Articles for creation: Иван Монтик (May 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CommanderWaterford were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Иван Монтик and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Иван Монтик, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CommanderWaterford&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:39, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Vlavluck. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Hemiauchenia (talk) 09:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Montik (May 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ivan Montik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ivan Montik, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ivan_Montik Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ivan_Montik reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Valaleilo&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Valaleilo. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ST47 (talk) 05:27, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi, can you please explain me why i've been blocked so i have no illusions about it. Which actions should I stop to make to have opportunity to join back to community?

In my protection i will tell the story of my crime. I found a topic that interests me (gambling). I started editing an article about one of the companies. After that I found a topic about which I would like to write - about the founder of the company. I have realized how difficult it is and have been working on that more than a month. Then i notice that someone violate the wiki community guidelines and make the report on the page Talk: SoftSwiss, but everyone didn't care. The user Fact789 continue to do it, and even find the way to make me a criminal and added me to a notice board. For defense I added him to a notice board too, but other user delete my post. After it i was broken. And made a desperate attempt to publish article and leave Wikipedia for a while. Now I see that this is not how things are done. I want to apologize to you and the wikipedia community and ask for permission to return to the community. I also ask you to pay attention to my report on the Talk: SoftSwiss page and help solve this situation.

I acknowledge that these are my accounts: Anti Antonio, Coldmanviktor, Vlavluck. But Valaleilo, Timumba, Kigorus - they have nothing to do with me.Vlavluck (talk) 09:12, 31 May 2021 (UTC)


 * User:Vlavluck - I did not block you. I requested that a CheckUser compare the IP addresses used by multiple accounts, because there appeared to be sockpuppetry.  It appears that  performed that check, and found conclusive evidence of the improper use of multiple accounts.  I see that the CheckUser notes show that some of the matches are more certain than others.  That is consistent with your statement that only some of the accounts are yours, in which case there may two sockpuppeteers, who both are blocked and both should be blocked.
 * You ask me to explain why you have been blocked so that you will have no illusions. I have no control over what your illusions are.  I do not know why you thought it was either necessary or appropriate to use three accounts.  You either knew that the dishonest use of multiple accounts is not permitted, or should have known that the use of multiple accounts is not permitted.  If you really thought that the use of multiple accounts is the way Wikipedia works, then neither ST47 nor I nor anyone else can help that you are too stupid.  I don't think that you are stupid.  I think that you misbehaved and got caught.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:07, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Maybe you used multiple accounts because you thought that another gang or sockfarm was using multiple accounts. If so, that is not an excuse.  If you suspected that someone else was engaged in sockpuppetry, you could have reported it, and they would have been caught, just as both they and you have been caught.
 * Since you did not have a history of constructive editing, I see no reason to unblock one of your accounts with a one account restriction. I am satisfied if the responding administrator declines your unblock request.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:07, 3 June 2021 (UTC)