User talk:Vlcwalker

Welcome to Wikipedia
Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 20:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

COI?
Hi Vlcwalker, I do not mean this as an accusing i just want make you aware of WP policy about conflict of interest. When you are an employee of Patricia Fennell or her company, that is a potential conflict, WP is frowning on making articles about your company or your employer and their product like FFPP. You can read about those policies at wp:coi and also you should see wp:medrs and wp:rs, some of the sources you are giving are not very reliable on WP. Thx, ask when you have question!! RetroS1mone  talk  22:26, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Patricia Fennell
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Patricia Fennell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * May not have professional notability, WP should not get used for promotion or networking.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RetroS1mone  talk  13:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Fennell Four Phase Model
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Fennell Four Phase Model, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Fennell Four Phase Model appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Fennell Four Phase Model has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Fennell Four Phase Model and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Fennell Four Phase Model with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Fennell Four Phase Model.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. RetroS1mone  talk  13:56, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Patricia Fennell
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Patricia Fennell. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Patricia Fennell (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 28 April 2010 (UTC)