User talk:Vlofvl

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Kelly (rugby league)


A tag has been placed on Richard Kelly (rugby league) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nima1024 (talk) 19:52, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Deletion review
Hi Richard, I have removed the comments you added to Articles for deletion/Richard Kelly (rugby league) as that discussion is closed now. If you disagree with its outcome, the place to raise your concerns is at Deletion review which is our forum for debating disputed deletions. Kind regards, nancy  23:49, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richard Kelly (rugby league)


The article Richard Kelly (rugby league) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. AstroCog (talk) 20:59, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Creators answer, please read

I am unsure why this article is up for deletion again, I have included 8 external links to articles that support the facts within the wiki article. Those sources include a publication from Johnson Press (Wakefield Express), the rugby league project website and the BBC, I don't know how much more reliable the support could be. In addition the article is linked to two other Wikipedia pages about Andy Kelly (Rugby League) and Neil Kelly both of whom are brothers to Richard Kelly. Within their pages there is further confirmation of the facts in the Richard Kelly article. I will continue to source further verifiable information but as explained before Richard Kelly played during an era before the Internet and finding online sources is difficult. I am in the process of digitising some newspaper and magazine articles which further support the facts contained on the page. vlofvl (Richard Kelly) 21 October 2011

November 2015
Hello, I'm Johnuniq. An edit that you recently made to Paul Ackford seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Johnuniq (talk) 02:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)