User talk:Vmjaishankar

July 2008
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Michellecrisp (talk) 00:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Visitor (ecclesiastical)
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Visitor (ecclesiastical), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://en.cyclopaedia.net/wiki/Visitor-(UK-Universities).

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 16:18, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Visitor (ecclesiastical)
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Visitor (ecclesiastical), may be copied from http://en.cyclopaedia.net/wiki/Visitor-(UK-Universities). It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 20:05, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Visitor a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. '' I have repaired the cut-and-paste page moves. Please do not try to do this again. Page moves such as this one should not be done without a community discussion on the appropriate titles and organization for the pages. See WP:Requested moves for more information on starting a discussion. '' Orlady (talk) 21:04, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The topic is Visitor moves. --Orlady (talk) 23:21, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Visitor visa
Hello Vmjaishankar,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Visitor visa for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, :.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:59, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Warning on page moves
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Visitor, you may be blocked from editing. ''Your page moves are disrupting Wikipedia. If you move any more pages without first obtaining consensus, your access will be blocked. '' Orlady (talk) 04:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello (talk) I am learning my way around wikipedia, sorry for move without following protocol, but I still think Visitor move is necessary based on what the word means for a broader audience as defined in http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/visitor Can you help start this discussion? Thx. User:Vmjaishankar 02:27, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Visitor visa
Hello, Vmjaishankar,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Visitor visa should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Visitor visa.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 03:27, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Visitor Insurance Services


A tag has been placed on Visitor Insurance Services requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses. Wikipedia is not the Yellow pages. If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets. Thank you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Visitor Insurance Services. Amaury (talk) 17:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Visitor-insurance-services-llc.png
Thanks for uploading File:Visitor-insurance-services-llc.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been blocked temporarily from editing for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:.

You have been warned not to remove speedy-templates from articles which you have created. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:40, 25 April 2015 (UTC)