User talk:Vndr

{| cellspacing="0" style="width:238px;background:#c5fcdc" {| cellspacing="0" style="width:238px;background:#E0E8FF"
 * style="width:45px;height:45px;background:#6ef7a7;text-align:center;font-size:14pt" | pl
 * style="font-size:8pt;padding:4pt;line-height:1.25em" | Polski jest językiem ojczystym tego użytkownika.|}
 * style="width:45px;height:45px;background:#99B3FF;text-align:center;font-size:14pt" | en-3
 * style="font-size:8pt;padding:4pt;line-height:1.25em" | This user is able to contribute with an advanced level of English.|}

{| cellspacing="0" style="width:238px;background:#F0F8FF"  
 * style="width:45px;height:45px;background:#C0C8FF;text-align:center;font-size:14pt;white-space:pre" | fr-1
 * style="font-size:8pt;padding:1px 4pt;line-height:1.25em" | Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau élémentaire de français. |}

iMe

 * Name: Mike Łaszczyk
 * Gender: Male
 * Age: ; birthdate 22 June 1985
 * Place of Birth: Warsaw, Poland

Non-free use disputed for Image:Oxbow Logo 2005.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Oxbow Logo 2005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Aquarel.gif
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Aquarel.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 20:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Riding_giants.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Riding_giants.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 00:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Oxbow (surfwear)
A tag has been placed on Oxbow (surfwear) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kittensandrainbows (talk) 01:32, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Nitro Snowboards for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nitro Snowboards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nitro Snowboards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:50, 14 March 2014 (UTC)